Literature DB >> 12753480

The repeatability and validity of dynamic retinoscopy in assessing the accommodative response.

J F McClelland1, K J Saunders.   

Abstract

Dynamic retinoscopy (DR) is an objective technique that has been used successfully to examine accommodative function of non-communicative patients. However, there are few studies examining its repeatability and validity. This paper addresses the repeatability and validity of a form of DR (a modified Nott technique), by comparing results to the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 Autorefractor whose validity and repeatability have previously been demonstrated. Accommodative responses of 41 subjects (aged 6-43 years) were assessed using DR and the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 Autorefractor. Three different target demands were used (10, 6 and 4 D). DR was shown to be repeatable for all target demands (paired t-test, p > 0.05). The results demonstrated good agreement between the autorefractor and DR. The results of the present study suggest that DR is a repeatable and valid objective technique for assessing accommodative function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12753480     DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00113.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  18 in total

1.  Accommodative performance of children with unilateral amblyopia.

Authors:  Vivian Manh; Angela M Chen; Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch; Susan A Cotter; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Accommodative accuracy by retinoscopy versus autorefraction spherical equivalent or horizontal meridian power.

Authors:  Angeline T Nguyen; Jenna L Wayne; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Ruth E Manny; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  The accommodative lag of the young hyperopic patient.

Authors:  T Rowan Candy; Kathryn H Gray; Christy C Hohenbary; Don W Lyon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Validation of the PowerRef 3 for Measuring Accommodation: Comparison With the Grand Seiko WAM-5500A Autorefractor.

Authors:  Alyssa M Gehring; Jennifer X Haensel; Molly K Curtiss; Tawna L Roberts
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.048

5.  Objective accommodation measurements in pseudophakic subjects using an autorefractor and an aberrometer.

Authors:  Dorothy M Win-Hall; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Accommodative lag by autorefraction and two dynamic retinoscopy methods.

Authors:  Ruth E Manny; Danielle L Chandler; Mitchelle M Scheiman; Jane E Gwiazda; Susan A Cotter; Donald F Everett; Jonathan M Holmes; Leslie G Hyman; Marjean T Kulp; Don W Lyon; Wendy Marsh-Tootle; Noelle Matta; B Michele Melia; Thomas T Norton; Michael X Repka; David I Silbert; Erik M Weissberg
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Modified bell retinoscopy: measuring accommodative lag in children.

Authors:  Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  OCT-based full crystalline lens shape change during accommodation in vivo.

Authors:  Eduardo Martinez-Enriquez; Pablo Pérez-Merino; Miriam Velasco-Ocana; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Static and dynamic crystalline lens accommodation evaluated using quantitative 3-D OCT.

Authors:  Enrique Gambra; Sergio Ortiz; Pablo Perez-Merino; Michalina Gora; Maciej Wojtkowski; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.732

10.  Clinical test responses to different orthoptic exercise regimes in typical young adults.

Authors:  Anna Horwood; Sonia Toor
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.