PURPOSE: To analyse data from vision screening of people with intellectual disabilities from the UK participating in Special Olympics during the National Summer Games in Cardiff 2001, in order to determine visual status and access to eye care. METHODS: Athletes were invited to take part in vision screening, according to Special Olympics protocols. RESULTS: Testability rates were high. Findings confirmed the high prevalence of eye and vision defects reported in other studies of people with intellectual disabilities. In particular, visual acuity was below normal for most athletes. Significant improvement to acuity could be achieved with spectacles although correction after full refraction did not always provide normal vision. Over 40% of athletes undergoing full refraction had below normal corrected acuity. CONCLUSIONS: Athletes with intellectual disabilities were no more likely to access eye care and have adequate spectacle correction than other people with intellectual disabilities. Optometrists and carers need to be aware of the high prevalence of defects and the importance of regular eye examinations in people with intellectual disabilities.
PURPOSE: To analyse data from vision screening of people with intellectual disabilities from the UK participating in Special Olympics during the National Summer Games in Cardiff 2001, in order to determine visual status and access to eye care. METHODS: Athletes were invited to take part in vision screening, according to Special Olympics protocols. RESULTS: Testability rates were high. Findings confirmed the high prevalence of eye and vision defects reported in other studies of people with intellectual disabilities. In particular, visual acuity was below normal for most athletes. Significant improvement to acuity could be achieved with spectacles although correction after full refraction did not always provide normal vision. Over 40% of athletes undergoing full refraction had below normal corrected acuity. CONCLUSIONS: Athletes with intellectual disabilities were no more likely to access eye care and have adequate spectacle correction than other people with intellectual disabilities. Optometrists and carers need to be aware of the high prevalence of defects and the importance of regular eye examinations in people with intellectual disabilities.
Authors: Qing Li; Robert Wojciechowski; Claire L Simpson; Pirro G Hysi; Virginie J M Verhoeven; Mohammad Kamran Ikram; René Höhn; Veronique Vitart; Alex W Hewitt; Konrad Oexle; Kari-Matti Mäkelä; Stuart MacGregor; Mario Pirastu; Qiao Fan; Ching-Yu Cheng; Beaté St Pourcain; George McMahon; John P Kemp; Kate Northstone; Jugnoo S Rahi; Phillippa M Cumberland; Nicholas G Martin; Paul G Sanfilippo; Yi Lu; Ya Xing Wang; Caroline Hayward; Ozren Polašek; Harry Campbell; Goran Bencic; Alan F Wright; Juho Wedenoja; Tanja Zeller; Arne Schillert; Alireza Mirshahi; Karl Lackner; Shea Ping Yip; Maurice K H Yap; Janina S Ried; Christian Gieger; Federico Murgia; James F Wilson; Brian Fleck; Seyhan Yazar; Johannes R Vingerling; Albert Hofman; André Uitterlinden; Fernando Rivadeneira; Najaf Amin; Lennart Karssen; Ben A Oostra; Xin Zhou; Yik-Ying Teo; E Shyong Tai; Eranga Vithana; Veluchamy Barathi; Yingfeng Zheng; Rosalynn Grace Siantar; Kumari Neelam; Youchan Shin; Janice Lam; Ekaterina Yonova-Doing; Cristina Venturini; S Mohsen Hosseini; Hoi-Suen Wong; Terho Lehtimäki; Mika Kähönen; Olli Raitakari; Nicholas J Timpson; David M Evans; Chiea-Chuen Khor; Tin Aung; Terri L Young; Paul Mitchell; Barbara Klein; Cornelia M van Duijn; Thomas Meitinger; Jost B Jonas; Paul N Baird; David A Mackey; Tien Yin Wong; Seang-Mei Saw; Olavi Pärssinen; Dwight Stambolian; Christopher J Hammond; Caroline C W Klaver; Cathy Williams; Andrew D Paterson; Joan E Bailey-Wilson; Jeremy A Guggenheim Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2014-11-04 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Rachel F Pilling; Lisa Donaldson; Marek Karas; R Jane Leitch; Howard Bunting; Ravi Naru; Gordon Ilett Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2021-04-08 Impact factor: 3.775