Literature DB >> 12753226

Patterns of nuclear DNA degeneration over time--a case study in historic teeth samples.

P Wandeler1, S Smith, P A Morin, R A Pettifor, S M Funk.   

Abstract

The amount of nuclear DNA extracted from teeth of 279 individual red fox Vulpes vulpes collected over a period spanning the last three decades was determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Although teeth were autoclaved during initial collection, 73.8% of extracts contained sufficient DNA concentration (> 5 pg/ micro L) suitable for reliable microsatellite genotyping but the quantity of nuclear DNA decayed significantly over time in a nonlinear pattern. The success of PCR amplification across four examined canine microsatellites over time was dependent on fragment size. By including data from two different tests for human contamination and from frequencies of allelic dropout and false alleles, the methodological constraints of population genetic studies using microsatellite loci amplified from historic DNA are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12753226     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01807.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  14 in total

1.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of allelic dropout and false allele error rates from microsatellite genotypes in the absence of reference data.

Authors:  Paul C D Johnson; Daniel T Haydon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Freshly excavated fossil bones are best for amplification of ancient DNA.

Authors:  Mélanie Pruvost; Reinhard Schwarz; Virginia Bessa Correia; Sophie Champlot; Séverine Braguier; Nicolas Morel; Yolanda Fernandez-Jalvo; Thierry Grange; Eva-Maria Geigl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A novel proof of concept for capturing the diversity of endophytic fungi preserved in herbarium specimens.

Authors:  Barnabas H Daru; Elizabeth A Bowman; Donald H Pfister; A Elizabeth Arnold
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The use of museum specimens with high-throughput DNA sequencers.

Authors:  Andrew S Burrell; Todd R Disotell; Christina M Bergey
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.895

5.  Factors affecting the STR amplification success in poorly preserved bone samples.

Authors:  Mikko T Putkonen; Jukka U Palo; Jose M Cano; Minttu Hedman; Antti Sajantila
Journal:  Investig Genet       Date:  2010-10-04

Review 6.  Ancient DNA studies: new perspectives on old samples.

Authors:  Ermanno Rizzi; Martina Lari; Elena Gigli; Gianluca De Bellis; David Caramelli
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Quantification of damage in DNA recovered from highly degraded samples--a case study on DNA in faeces.

Authors:  Bruce E Deagle; J Paige Eveson; Simon N Jarman
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  Monitoring DNA contamination in handled vs. directly excavated ancient human skeletal remains.

Authors:  Elena Pilli; Alessandra Modi; Ciro Serpico; Alessandro Achilli; Hovirag Lancioni; Barbara Lippi; Francesca Bertoldi; Sauro Gelichi; Martina Lari; David Caramelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  No evidence of Neandertal mtDNA contribution to early modern humans.

Authors:  David Serre; André Langaney; Mario Chech; Maria Teschler-Nicola; Maja Paunovic; Philippe Mennecier; Michael Hofreiter; Göran Possnert; Svante Pääbo
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-03-16       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  DNA damage in preserved specimens and tissue samples: a molecular assessment.

Authors:  Juergen Zimmermann; Mehrdad Hajibabaei; David C Blackburn; James Hanken; Elizabeth Cantin; Janos Posfai; Thomas C Evans
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.