Literature DB >> 12752865

Impact of clinical nurse specialists in multiple sclerosis--synthesis of the evidence.

Angus Forbes1, Alison While, Liz Dyson, Tricia Grocott, Peter Griffiths.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis is a chronic neurological condition demanding a broad range of interventions and support. Multiple sclerosis nurse specialists are emerging as a leading force in providing care to this group of patients. AIM: This review aimed to identify and synthesize the evidence on the role of clinical nurse specialists in meeting the care needs of people with multiple sclerosis.
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature addressing the role of the multiple sclerosis nurse specialist was undertaken. The review examined both the appropriateness and effectiveness of the multiple sclerosis nurse specialist role. The content of each item identified in the review was analysed, examining the structure, process and outcomes variables associated with the role. Materials containing an explicit methodology were critically appraised using established schedules and graded as strong, moderate or weak. The data were then synthesized in tables, thematically and using a quasi-judicial approach called the 'System of Reasoning'.
FINDINGS: Fifty-five items were examined and most (53%; n = 18) were descriptive in nature. There was insufficient evidence to demonstrate that the multiple sclerosis nurse role makes a difference to care. However, evidence was found to support current descriptions of the role - meaning? and there appeared to be a good fit between the role and the care needs of people with multiple sclerosis.
CONCLUSION: A systematic overview of the attributes of the multiple sclerosis nurse role is provided which should help service providers, nurses and other professionals consider how multiple sclerosis nurse specialists roles can contribute to the care of people with this condition. While there is little current evidence of effectiveness for the multiple sclerosis nurse specialist role, there is evidence for its appropriateness, although more rigorous primary research is required to test this.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12752865     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02644.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  4 in total

1.  Nurse case management and general practice: implications for GP consortia.

Authors:  Steve Iliffe; Vari Drennan; Jill Manthorpe; Heather Gage; Sue L Davies; Helen Massey; Cherill Scott; Sally Brearley; Claire Goodman
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Multiple sclerosis: patients' information sources and needs on disease symptoms and management.

Authors:  Albert I Matti; Helen McCarl; Pamela Klaer; Miriam C Keane; Celia S Chen
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 2.711

3.  Hospital nurse-staffing models and patient- and staff-related outcomes.

Authors:  Michelle Butler; Timothy J Schultz; Phil Halligan; Ann Sheridan; Leigh Kinsman; Thomas Rotter; Jonathan Beaumier; Robyn Gail Kelly; Jonathan Drennan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-23

4.  The effect of nurse practitioner (NP-led) care on health-related quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis - a randomized trial.

Authors:  Penelope Smyth; Kaitlyn E Watson; Yazid N Al Hamarneh; Ross T Tsuyuki
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 2.903

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.