Literature DB >> 12752243

Testis conserving chemotherapy in germ cell cancer: its potential to increase understanding of the biology and treatment of carcinoma-in-situ.

R T D Oliver1, J Ong, D Berney, V Nargund, D Badenoch, J Shamash.   

Abstract

Prompted by recognition of the potential of chemotherapy to increase the success of testis conserving surgery in patients with germ cell cancer, background and outcome data are reviewed and their contribution to the ongoing debate about how germ cell cancer develops discussed. The review is based on three previous studies of: a) time trends in tumour size in 578 personal series of all stages of testis cancer treated since 1978; b) impact of chemotherapy on actuarial risk of tumours in contralateral testis examined on 1221 patients treated in trials through the Anglian Germ Cell Cancer Consortium; and c) testes conservation attempted using chemotherapy in 78 patients. Since 1978 tumour size has decreased from 4.8 to 3.0 cms while cure has gone from 77 to 97%. There was no overall long term reduction in second cancers beyond 10 years in stage 1 patients after orchidectomy alone compared to stage 1 or metastatic disease patients receiving chemotherapy though the incidence was non significantly lower up to 10 years particularly in those patients receiving etoposide based combination. Testis conservation was initially successful in 28 of 78 (36%). An additional 25 (32%) had no viable cancer in orchidectomy specimen. In the 28 primary tumours cured by chemotherapy there was a 26% late relapse rate between 5 and 10 years (all cured by orchidectomy) compared to less than 5% in those cured with established metastases. In conclusion, testis conservation with chemotherapy is safe and feasible, though relapse is too frequent for routine service use. Confirmation of the high frequency of late relapse by others has raised the question whether these recurrences are due to post pubertal events reinducing CIS in intrauterine oestrogen primed germ cells and highlights the potential of testes conservation studies to better understand germ cell cancer development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12752243     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0463.2003.11101121.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  APMIS        ISSN: 0903-4641            Impact factor:   3.205


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Organ-sparing surgery for testicular tumors].

Authors:  L Weissbach; C Schaefer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Management of the contralateral testicle in patients with unilateral testicular cancer.

Authors:  Eugene K Lee; Jeffrey M Holzbeierlein
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Hypermethylation of the 5' CpG island of the gene encoding the serine protease Testisin promotes its loss in testicular tumorigenesis.

Authors:  K J Manton; M L Douglas; S Netzel-Arnett; D R Fitzpatrick; D L Nicol; A W Boyd; J A Clements; T M Antalis
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 4.  Role of chemotherapy prior to orchiectomy in metastatic testicular cancer-is testis really a sanctuary site?

Authors:  B Vinusha Reddy; A Sivakanth; G Naveen Babu; Krishnamurthy Swamyvelu; Yg Basavana Goud; Ba Madhusudhana; Vasu Reddy Challa
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2014-02-27

5.  Histology, 12p status, and IMP3 expression separate subtypes in testicular teratomas.

Authors:  Dávid Semjén; Krisztina Bíró; Emese Kapitány; Endre Kálmán; Tamás Tornóczky; Béla Kajtár
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 4.064

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.