Literature DB >> 12752165

Do Italian mothers prefer cesarean delivery?

Serena Donati1, Michele E Grandolfo, Silvia Andreozzi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Italy the proportion of births by cesarean section rose from 11.2 percent in 1980 to 27.9 percent in 1996 and 33.2 percent in 2000. The aim of this study was to identify factors, other than medical and obstetrical risk, that may influence the method of delivery and to analyze mother's preference for vaginal versus cesarean delivery among women after the birth of their first baby in university hospitals in Italy.
METHODS: Primiparous women were selected from 100 consecutive deliveries in 23 university hospitals in 1999. To determine antenatal, delivery, and postnatal history, and women's preference for method of delivery, trained health personnel interviewed 1986 women.
RESULTS: Of the 1986 women who were interviewed (response rate 95%), 1023 primiparas comprised the study sample. The cesarean section rate was 36 percent. Ninety-one percent of the women who delivered spontaneously and 73 percent of those who underwent a cesarean section would have preferred a vaginal delivery.
CONCLUSIONS: Most of the interviewed women in this study preferred, or were satisfied with, vaginal birth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12752165     DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2003.00226.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  8 in total

1.  Do caesarean section rates 'catch-up'? Evidence from 14 European countries.

Authors:  Wen-Yi Chen
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2013-03-22

2.  Preference of ghanaian women for vaginal or caesarean delivery postpartum.

Authors:  Ka Danso; Hm Schwandt; Ca Turpin; Jd Seffah; A Samba; Mj Hindin
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2009-03

3.  Mind the information gap: fertility rate and use of cesarean delivery and tocolytic hospitalizations in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ke-Zong M Ma; Edward C Norton; Shoou-Yih D Lee
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2011-12-12

Review 4.  Women's preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  A Mazzoni; F Althabe; N H Liu; A M Bonotti; L Gibbons; A J Sánchez; J M Belizán
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 7.331

5.  Improving the organisation of maternal health service delivery and optimising childbirth by increasing vaginal birth after caesarean section through enhanced women-centred care (OptiBIRTH trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN10612254).

Authors:  Mike Clarke; Gerard Savage; Valerie Smith; Deirdre Daly; Declan Devane; Mechthild M Gross; Susanne Grylka-Baeschlin; Patricia Healy; Sandra Morano; Jane Nicoletti; Cecily Begley
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 6.  Lessons from a multidisciplinary partnership involving women parliamentarians to address the overuse of caesarean section in Italy.

Authors:  Pilar Montilla; Francesca Merzagora; Elisa Scolaro; Jennifer Requejo; Walter Ricciardi; Elena Meli; Adriana Bazzi; Giorgio Vittori; Flavia Bustreo; Rosanna Boldi; Maria Rizzoti; Mario Merialdi; Ana Pilar Betran
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-02-23

7.  Comparison of neonatal intensive care: Trento area versus Vermont Oxford Network.

Authors:  Giuseppe De Nisi; Mariarosaria Berti; Riccardo Malossi; Fabio Pederzini; Anna Pedrotti; Alberta Valente
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 2.638

8.  Do Italian women prefer cesarean section? Results from a survey on mode of delivery preferences.

Authors:  Maria Regina Torloni; Ana Pilar Betrán; Pilar Montilla; Elisa Scolaro; Armando Seuc; Agustina Mazzoni; Fernando Althabe; Francesca Merzagora; Gian Paolo Donzelli; Mario Merialdi
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.