Literature DB >> 12751884

The Delirium Observation Screening Scale: a screening instrument for delirium.

Marieke J Schuurmans1, Lillie M Shortridge-Baggett, Sijmen A Duursma.   

Abstract

The Delirium Observation Screening (DOS) scale, a 25-item scale, was developed to facilitate early recognition of delirium, according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV criteria, based on nurses' observations during regular care. The scale was tested for content validity by a group of seven experts in the field of delirium. Internal consistency, predictive validity, and concurrent and construct validity were tested in two prospective studies with high risk groups of patients: geriatric medicine patients and elderly hip fracture patients. Among the patients admitted to a geriatric department (N = 82), 4 became delirious; among the elderly hip fracture patients (N = 92), 18 became delirious. The DOS scale was determined to be content valid and showed high internal consistency, alpha = 0.93 and alpha = 0.96. Predictive validity against the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV diagnosis of delirium made by a geriatrician was good in both studies. Correlations of the DOS scale with the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) were Rs -0.79 (p < or = 0.001) in the hip fracture patients and Rs -0.66 (p < or = 0.001) in the geriatric medicine patients. Concurrent validity, as tested by comparison of the research nurse's ratings of the DOS scale and the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), for the group of hip fracture patients was 0.63 (p < or = 0.001). Construct validity of the DOS was tested against the Informant Questionnaire of Cognitive Decline in Elderly (IQCODE), a preexisting psychiatric diagnosis and the Barthel Index. Correlation with the IQCODE was 0.74 (p < or = 0.001) in the study with the hip fracture patients and 0.33 (p < or = 0.05) in the study with the geriatric medicine patients. Correlation with the Barthel Index was -0.26 (p < or = 0.05) in the geriatric medicine patients and -0.55 (p < or = 0.001) in the hip fracture patients. The overall conclusion of these studies is that the DOS scale shows satisfactory validity and reliability, to guide early recognition of delirium by nurses' observation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12751884     DOI: 10.1891/rtnp.17.1.31.53169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Theory Nurs Pract        ISSN: 1541-6577            Impact factor:   0.688


  136 in total

1.  Epigenetics of neuroinflammation: Immune response, inflammatory response and cholinergic synaptic involvement evidenced by genome-wide DNA methylation analysis of delirious inpatients.

Authors:  Taku Saito; Hiroyuki Toda; Gabrielle N Duncan; Sydney S Jellison; Tong Yu; Mason J Klisares; Sophia Daniel; Allison J Andreasen; Lydia R Leyden; Mandy M Hellman; Eri Shinozaki; Sangil Lee; Aihide Yoshino; Hyunkeun R Cho; Gen Shinozaki
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  Improved perioperative neurological monitoring of coronary artery bypass graft patients reduces the incidence of postoperative delirium: the Haga Brain Care Strategy.

Authors:  Wijnand A C Palmbergen; Agnes van Sonderen; Ali M Keyhan-Falsafi; Ruud W M Keunen; Ron Wolterbeek
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-07-09

3.  New Delirium Severity Indicators: Generation and Internal Validation in the Better Assessment of Illness (BASIL) Study.

Authors:  Sarinnapha M Vasunilashorn; Dena Schulman-Green; Douglas Tommet; Tamara G Fong; Tammy T Hshieh; Edward R Marcantonio; Eran D Metzger; Eva M Schmitt; Patricia A Tabloski; Thomas G Travison; Yun Gou; Benjamin Helfand; Sharon K Inouye; Richard N Jones
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.959

Review 4.  Delirium in elderly people.

Authors:  Sharon K Inouye; Rudi G J Westendorp; Jane S Saczynski
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Delirium: where do we stand?

Authors:  Chi-Un Pae; David M Marks; Changsu Han; Ashwin A Patkar; Prakash Masand
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 6.  Assessment scales for delirium: A review.

Authors:  Sandeep Grover; Natasha Kate
Journal:  World J Psychiatry       Date:  2012-08-22

7.  Effectiveness of multicomponent nonpharmacological delirium interventions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tammy T Hshieh; Jirong Yue; Esther Oh; Margaret Puelle; Sarah Dowal; Thomas Travison; Sharon K Inouye
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 8.  The interface between delirium and dementia in elderly adults.

Authors:  Tamara G Fong; Daniel Davis; Matthew E Growdon; Asha Albuquerque; Sharon K Inouye
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 44.182

9.  Meeting the Challenges of Delirium Assessment Across the Aging Spectrum.

Authors:  Heidi A B Smith; Jin H Han; E Wesley Ely
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Validation of the delirium observation screening scale in a hospitalized older population.

Authors:  Katherine Gavinski; Ryan Carnahan; Michelle Weckmann
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.960

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.