Literature DB >> 12751812

ERP correlates of true and false recognition after different retention delays: stimulus- and response-related processes.

Doreen Nessler1, Axel Mecklinger.   

Abstract

Performance and electrophysiological correlates of true and false recognition were examined after short (40 s) and long (80 s) delays. True recognition showed no significant decrease after a long delay, whereas false recognition increased. Early frontal and parietal ERP old/new effects, considered as correlates of familiarity and recollection, were observed across delay for true recognition. No frontal effect occurred in the long delay for false recognition. This absence may arise from weakened memory traces preventing familiarity discrimination for LUREs. Response-related analysis revealed an error-related negativity (ERN) for true and false recognition, assuming that the effect reflects at least partly an internal misrepresentation of the correct response. The larger and topographically different ERNs for false recognition suggest an additional contribution of increased task demands and conditions of high response uncertainty.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12751812     DOI: 10.1111/1469-8986.00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  9 in total

1.  The FN400 indexes familiarity-based recognition of faces.

Authors:  Tim Curran; Jane Hancock
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Event-related potentials reveal age differences in the encoding and recognition of scenes.

Authors:  Angela H Gutchess; Yoko Ieuji; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Examining ERP correlates of recognition memory: evidence of accurate source recognition without recollection.

Authors:  Richard J Addante; Charan Ranganath; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Separating recognition processes of declarative memory via anodal tDCS: boosting old item recognition by temporal and new item detection by parietal stimulation.

Authors:  Alberto Pisoni; Zsolt Turi; Almuth Raithel; Géza Gergely Ambrus; Ivan Alekseichuk; Annekathrin Schacht; Walter Paulus; Andrea Antal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Competitive Semantic Memory Retrieval: Temporal Dynamics Revealed by Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Robin Hellerstedt; Mikael Johansson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Separating content-specific retrieval from post-retrieval processing.

Authors:  Amie N Doidge; Lisa H Evans; Jane E Herron; Edward L Wilding
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Brain potentials of conflict and error-likelihood following errorful and errorless learning in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  Anke Hammer; Andreas Kordon; Marcus Heldmann; Bartosz Zurowski; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Event-related brain potentials that distinguish false memory for events that occurred only seconds in the past.

Authors:  Hong Chen; Joel L Voss; Chunyan Guo
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.759

9.  Memory Distortion and Its Avoidance: An Event-Related Potentials Study on False Recognition and Correct Rejection.

Authors:  Sara Cadavid; Maria Soledad Beato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.