Literature DB >> 12751580

Effect of hypoxia on preferred hand temperature.

Petra Golja1, Igor B Mekjavic.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Selection of preferred skin temperature is a consequence of complex central neural integration of thermoafferent information in the polysynaptic pathway for behavioral thermoregulation. The present study tested the hypothesis that hypoxia alters behavioral temperature regulation.
METHODS: Eight male volunteers participated in two separate trials. In each trial they were immersed in 28 degrees C water for 90 min, and inspired either room air (air trial) or a hypoxic gas mixture (hypoxia trial; 11.5% O2/88.5% N2). Their left hand was placed in a separate bath perfused with water. At regular intervals they were instructed to adjust the temperature of the water perfusing the hand bath to a comfortable temperature, defined as the 'preferred hand temperature' (Tpref). At minute intervals, esophageal (Tes), rectal (Tre), and skin (Tsk) temperatures, along with heat flux from the skin (Q) and ventilation (VI) were recorded. The observed responses were compared with a one-way ANOVA.
RESULTS: With the exception of VI, there were no significant differences in any of the recorded variables between the two conditions. During the immersion, Tes and Tre decreased by 1.0 and 0.7 degrees C, respectively, in the air trial, and by 0.8 and 0.7 degrees C, respectively, in the hypoxia trial. Concomitant with decreases in core temperature, there was a significant increase (p < 0.05) in Tpref of 2.1 degrees C in the air trial and 2.4 degrees C in the hypoxia trial. The difference in Tpref between the air and hypoxia trials was not significant. DISCUSSION: Assuming that the selection of preferred hand temperature represents a behavioral thermoregulatory response, the present results suggest that moderate normobaric hypoxia does not affect human behavioral thermoregulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12751580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med        ISSN: 0095-6562


  6 in total

Review 1.  Functional architecture of behavioural thermoregulation.

Authors:  Andreas D Flouris
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Moderate hypoxia does not affect the zone of thermal comfort in humans.

Authors:  P Golja; A Kacin; M J Tipton; I B Mekjavic
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-01-22       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  The effect of a Live-high Train-high exercise regimen on behavioural temperature regulation.

Authors:  Shawnda A Morrison; Urša Ciuha; Daniela Zavec-Pavlinić; Ola Eiken; Igor B Mekjavic
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Hypoxia induces no change in cutaneous thresholds for warmth and cold sensation.

Authors:  U L Malanda; J P H Reulen; W H M Saris; W D van Marken Lichtenbelt
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 5.  Responses of the hands and feet to cold exposure.

Authors:  Stephen S Cheung
Journal:  Temperature (Austin)       Date:  2015-02-27

6.  Hypoxia gradually augments metabolic and thermoperceptual responsiveness to repeated whole-body cold stress in humans.

Authors:  Michail E Keramidas; Roger Kölegård; Ola Eiken
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.858

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.