Literature DB >> 12751578

Lumbar spine disc heights and curvature: upright posture vs. supine compression harness.

Shi-Uk Lee1, Alan R Hargens, Michael Fredericson, Philipp K Lang.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Spinal lengthening in microgravity is thought to cause back pain in astronauts. A spinal compression harness can compress the spine to eliminate lengthening but the loading condition with harness is different than physiologic conditions. Our purpose was to compare the effect of spine compression with a harness in supine position on disk height and spinal curvature in the lumbar spine to that of upright position as measured using a vertically open magnetic resonance imaging system.
METHODS: Fifteen healthy subjects volunteered. On day 1, each subject lay supine for an hour and a baseline scan of the lumbar spine was performed. After applying a load of fifty percent of body weight with the harness for thirty minutes, the lumbar spine was scanned again. On day 2, after a baseline scan, a follow up scan was performed after kneeling for thirty minutes within the gap between two vertically oriented magnetic coils. Anterior and posterior disk heights, posterior disk bulging, and spinal curvature were measured from the baseline and follow up scans.
RESULTS: Anterior disk heights increased and posterior disk heights decreased compared with baseline scans both after spinal compression with harness and upright posture. The spinal curvature increased by both loading conditions of the spine. DISCUSSION: The spinal compression with specially designed harness has the same effect as the physiologic loading of the spine in the kneeling upright position. The harness shows some promise as a tool to increase the diagnostic capabilities of a conventional MR system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Musculoskeletal; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12751578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med        ISSN: 0095-6562


  11 in total

1.  Computed tomography measurements of the lumbar spinous processes and interspinous space.

Authors:  Rolf Sobottke; Timmo Koy; Marc Röllinghoff; Jan Siewe; Thomas Kreitz; Daniel Müller; Christopher Bangard; Peer Eysel
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  The effects of rehabilitation on the muscles of the trunk following prolonged bed rest.

Authors:  Julie A Hides; Gunda Lambrecht; Carolyn A Richardson; Warren R Stanton; Gabriele Armbrecht; Casey Pruett; Volker Damann; Dieter Felsenberg; Daniel L Belavý
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Comparison between pain at discography and morphological disc changes at axial loaded MRI in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Hanna Hebelka; Helena Brisby; Tommy Hansson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Body posture and backpack loading: an upright magnetic resonance imaging study of the adult lumbar spine.

Authors:  Stephen Shymon; Alan R Hargens; Lawrence A Minkoff; Douglas G Chang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Current concept in upright spinal MRI.

Authors:  R Botchu; A Bharath; A M Davies; S Butt; S L James
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Muscle imbalance among elite Australian rules football players: a longitudinal study of changes in trunk muscle size.

Authors:  Julie Hides; Warren Stanton
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  External pneumatic compression device prevents fainting in standing weight-bearing MRI: a cohort study.

Authors:  Bjarke B Hansen; Rasmus Bouert; Henning Bliddal; Robin Christensen; Tom Bendix; Anders Christensen; Jesper Mehlsen; Zoreh Rasti; Mikael Boesen
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Use of machine learning to select texture features in investigating the effects of axial loading on T2-maps from magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar discs.

Authors:  Vahid Abdollah; Eric C Parent; Samin Dolatabadi; Erica Marr; Keith Wachowicz; Michele Battié
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 2.721

9.  A fast, accurate, and reliable reconstruction method of the lumbar spine vertebrae using positional MRI.

Authors:  Craig J Simons; Loren Cobb; Bradley S Davidson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Lumbar spine MRI in upright position for diagnosing acute and chronic low back pain: statistical analysis of morphological changes.

Authors:  Umberto Tarantino; Ezio Fanucci; Riccardo Iundusi; Monica Celi; Simone Altobelli; Elena Gasbarra; Giovanni Simonetti; Guglielmo Manenti
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-09-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.