Literature DB >> 12751376

Pathological features of breast cancer response following neoadjuvant treatment with either letrozole or tamoxifen.

W R Miller1, J M Dixon, L Macfarlane, D Cameron, T J Anderson.   

Abstract

Morphological characteristics, grading features, proliferation marker MIB1, apoptosis (by Tdt-mediated duTP-biotin nick-end labelling (TUNEL)), Bcl-2 expression, oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) status were compared in ER-positive breast cancers before and after 3 months of neoadjuvant therapy with either letrozole or tamoxifen. Daily treatment was with letrozole 2.5 mg (12 patients) or 10 mg (12 patients), or with tamoxifen 20 mg(24 patients). Letrozole treatment was associated with a pathological response in 17 of 24 (71%) patients. The predominant change in grading features was a decrease in mitosis, and the expression of MIB1 was reduced in all of the 22 evaluable cases. Whilst only marginal changes were observed in ER expression following letrozole therapy, PgR reactivity was reduced in 20 of 21 evaluable cases which were initially PgR-positive, becoming undetectable in 16 patients. Tamoxifen treatment was associated with pathological response in 15 of 24 (63%) tumours. In contrast to letrozole, the dominant change in grading feature was an increase in tubule formation, ER score was markedly reduced in most cases, and the most common effect on PgR was an increased expression. Following treatment with either tamoxifen or letrozole, variable effects were observed on the apoptotic index and expression of Bcl-2. These results indicate that both letrozole and tamoxifen have marked influences on the pathological features of breast cancer during neoadjuvant therapy. However, the effects of the two agents varied such that the phenotypes of letrozole- and tamoxifen-treated tumours differ markedly. Effects on clinical, pathological and biological endpoints were frequently disconcordant--future studies will therefore require the evaluation of multiple parameters in order to fully assess tumour response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12751376     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(02)00600-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  13 in total

1.  Aromatase immunoreactivity is increased in mammographically dense regions of the breast.

Authors:  Celine M Vachon; Hironobu Sasano; Karthik Ghosh; Kathleen R Brandt; David A Watson; Carol Reynolds; Wilma L Lingle; Paul E Goss; Rong Li; Sarah E Aiyar; Christopher G Scott; V Shane Pankratz; Richard J Santen; James N Ingle
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  Family Matters: Collaboration and Conflict Among the Steroid Receptors Raises a Need for Group Therapy.

Authors:  Matthew J Sikora
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.736

3.  Involvement of matrix metalloproteinase activity in hormone-induced mammary tumor regression.

Authors:  Marina Simian; Alfredo Molinolo; Claudia Lanari
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Histopathological assessment of anastrozole and tamoxifen as preoperative (neoadjuvant) treatment in postmenopausal Japanese women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in the PROACT trial.

Authors:  Masafumi Kurosumi; Yuichi Takatsuka; Toru Watanabe; Shigeru Imoto; Hideo Inaji; Hitoshi Tsuda; Futoshi Akiyama; Goi Sakamoto; Tadashi Ikeda; Shinzaburo Noguchi
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Vitexins, nature-derived lignan compounds, induce apoptosis and suppress tumor growth.

Authors:  YingJun Zhou; Yiliang Ellie Liu; JianGuo Cao; GuangYao Zeng; Cui Shen; YanLan Li; MeiChen Zhou; Yiding Chen; Weiping Pu; Louis Potters; Y Eric Shi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Relationship between plasma estradiol levels and estrogen-responsive gene expression in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Anita K Dunbier; Helen Anderson; Zara Ghazoui; Elizabeth J Folkerd; Roger A'hern; Robert J Crowder; Jeremy Hoog; Ian E Smith; Peter Osin; Ashutosh Nerurkar; Joel S Parker; Charles M Perou; Matthew J Ellis; Mitch Dowsett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Understanding the mechanisms of aromatase inhibitor resistance.

Authors:  William R Miller; Alexey A Larionov
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Exemestane as primary treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women: a phase II trial.

Authors:  A Barnadas; M Gil; S González; I Tusquets; M Muñoz; A Arcusa; L Prieto; M Margelí-Vila; A Moreno
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Risk estimation of distant metastasis in node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients using an RT-PCR based prognostic expression signature.

Authors:  Andrew Tutt; Alice Wang; Charles Rowland; Cheryl Gillett; Kit Lau; Karen Chew; Hongyue Dai; Shirley Kwok; Kenneth Ryder; Henry Shu; Robert Springall; Paul Cane; Blair McCallie; Lauren Kam-Morgan; Steve Anderson; Horst Buerger; Joe Gray; James Bennington; Laura Esserman; Trevor Hastie; Samuel Broder; John Sninsky; Burkhard Brandt; Fred Waldman
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Proliferation, steroid receptors and clinical/pathological response in breast cancer treated with letrozole.

Authors:  W R Miller; S White; J M Dixon; J Murray; L Renshaw; T J Anderson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.