Secondary splenic rupture after thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. HISTORY AND ADMISSION FINDINGS: A 67-year-old male patient was admitted with acute chest pain and signs of an acute anterior myocardial infarction in the ECG. The usual contraindications were excluded and after a systemic lysis with rt-PA the ECG-alterations as well as the symptoms of angina resolved completely. 2 hours later the patient developed an acute abdomen with a severe circulatory shock. INVESTIGATIONS: On ultrasound and CT a massive intraabdominal bleeding was found. TREATMENT AND COURSE: Emergency laparotomy revealed a splenic rupture. Retrospectively, 6 weeks before admission, the patient had fallen from a ladder to his left side. This is a rare case of a secondary splenic rupture during thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. 2 weeks later the patient developed rein-farction with angiographically shown two vessel disease. After angioplasty of the ramus interventricularis anterior (RIVA) he was stable. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous thrombolysis in case of acute myocardial infarction is the method of choice. In the past a great number of patients were excluded from thrombolysis because of an extensive interpretation of contraindications. The aim to reach an alteration in this use may not risk health of patients by insufficient history.
Secondary splenic rupture after thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. HISTORY AND ADMISSION FINDINGS: A 67-year-old male patient was admitted with acute chest pain and signs of an acute anterior myocardial infarction in the ECG. The usual contraindications were excluded and after a systemic lysis with rt-PA the ECG-alterations as well as the symptoms of angina resolved completely. 2 hours later the patient developed an acute abdomen with a severe circulatory shock. INVESTIGATIONS: On ultrasound and CT a massive intraabdominal bleeding was found. TREATMENT AND COURSE: Emergency laparotomy revealed a splenic rupture. Retrospectively, 6 weeks before admission, the patient had fallen from a ladder to his left side. This is a rare case of a secondary splenic rupture during thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. 2 weeks later the patient developed rein-farction with angiographically shown two vessel disease. After angioplasty of the ramus interventricularis anterior (RIVA) he was stable. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous thrombolysis in case of acute myocardial infarction is the method of choice. In the past a great number of patients were excluded from thrombolysis because of an extensive interpretation of contraindications. The aim to reach an alteration in this use may not risk health of patients by insufficient history.