Literature DB >> 12750862

Ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Giuseppe Riboni1, Aldo Bellini, Sergio Serantoni, Elena Rognoni, Luigi Bisanti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical examination of newborns has been shown to be inadequate for the early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). It is debatable whether US examination is a valid alternative.
OBJECTIVE: To contribute further knowledge to the natural history of DDH; to examine the distribution of hip morphology as classified by Graf according to sex and risk factors in an unselected Italian population; to propose a temporal pattern of US screening of all newborns to detect DDH.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All newborns (n=8,896) sequentially delivered in the Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Milan underwent US examination in the first week of life and, when findings were within normal limits, in the third month of life. Subjects categorised at birth as Graf type 2a with alpha angle between 50 degrees and 52 degrees, underwent a further US examination at the end of the first month of life. Subjects with ambiguous findings at the 3-month examination were re-examined at the end of the fourth month of life. All infants with abnormal hips abandoned the screening process and underwent treatment. RESULTS. Overall, 56 cases of DDH were identified: 34 in the first week of life examination, 10 at 1 month; 10 at 3 months and 2 at 4 months. CONCLUSIONS. A two-step US screening of newborns is recommended: at the end of the first month and within the fourth month of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12750862     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-003-0940-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  37 in total

1.  [Ultrasound screening of the neonatal hip: results and experiences].

Authors:  R Ganger; F Grill; S Leodolter; M Vitek
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.548

2.  Ultrasound screening of hips at risk for CDH. Failure to reduce the incidence of late cases.

Authors:  N M Clarke; J Clegg; A N Al-Chalabi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1989-01

3.  Ultrasound appearance of the hip joint in newborns during the first week of life.

Authors:  A Sośnierz; M Karel; S Maj; G Kolanko
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 0.910

4.  The role of ultrasound in diagnosis and management of developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  H T Harcke
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1995

5.  [Sonography of the hip in infants].

Authors:  R Graf
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug

6.  The use of sonography in screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  J S Donaldson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the neonate: the effect on treatment rate and prevalence of late cases.

Authors:  K Rosendahl; T Markestad; R T Lie
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Genetic and environmental factors in the etiology of congenital dislocation of the hip.

Authors:  C O Carter; J A Wilkinson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1964 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  [The hip joint of children. Clinical diagnosis in the infant].

Authors:  P Schuler
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug

10.  Ultrasound screening for congenital dislocation of the hip: a limited targeted programme.

Authors:  D N Teanby; R W Paton
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.324

View more
  14 in total

1.  [Congenital hip dysplasia in newborns : Clinical and ultrasound examination, arthrography and closed reduction].

Authors:  R Placzek; J F Funk; C Druschel
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  Clinical examination versus ultrasonography in detecting developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  H Dogruel; H Atalar; O Y Yavuz; U Sayli
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Diagnostic Performance of Clinical Examination Versus Ultrasonography in the Detection of Developmental Dysplasia of Hip: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Chavoshi; Ghazaleh Soltani; Shekoufe Shafiei Zargar; Cody Clayton Wyles; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Pouria Rouzrokh
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2022-05

Review 4.  Musculoskeletal sonography in the neonate and infant.

Authors:  Marc S Keller
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2005-08-03

5.  To screen or not to screen? A decision analysis of the utility of screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Susan T Mahan; Jeffrey N Katz; Young-Jo Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  Ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hip: what have we learned?

Authors:  Jennifer Bracken; Michael Ditchfield
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-09-02

7.  Pubo-femoral distance: an easy sonographic screening test to avoid late diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  C Tréguier; M Chapuis; B Branger; B Bruneau; A Grellier; K Chouklati; M Proisy; P Darnault; P Violas; P Pladys; Y Gandon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-10-20       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Ultrasound in the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns. The European approach. A review of methods, accuracy and clinical validity.

Authors:  Karen Rosendahl; Paolo Toma
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 7.034

9.  Reproducibility of different screening classifications in ultrasonography of the newborn hip.

Authors:  Christian D Peterlein; Karl F Schüttler; Stefan Lakemeier; Nina Timmesfeld; Christian Görg; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Markus D Schofer
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  [When is the optimal time for hip ultrasound screening?].

Authors:  S Farr; F Grill; D Müller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.004

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.