Literature DB >> 12750669

Assessment of facial asymmetries from posteroanterior cephalograms: validity of reference lines.

Biljana Trpkova1, Narasimha G Prasad, Ernest W N Lam, Donald Raboud, Kenneth E Glover, Paul W Major.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine the ability of various horizontal and vertical reference lines to provide measurements of dentofacial asymmetries from posteroanterior (PA) cephalograms. Ten horizontal and 15 vertical reference lines, including best-fit lines and lines most commonly used in PA analysis, were tested. A model of a dry skull was devised to create 30 asymmetric positions of the maxillomandibular complex. The true transverse and vertical asymmetries were calculated based on measurements of changes in the position of 24 dental and skeletal landmarks. A PA cephalogram was obtained for each asymmetric position. The horizontal and vertical reference lines were constructed on each PA cephalogram, and measurements of transverse and vertical asymmetries were obtained relative to the individual reference lines. Linear regression analyses were used to compare the actual asymmetries with those measured cephalometrically, relative to the individual reference lines. The adjusted R(2) values for all 10 horizontal lines indicated excellent agreement between the true asymmetries and the measured vertical asymmetries. Ten vertical lines accurately represented transverse asymmetry. Vertical lines constructed between 2 midline points, with 1 point located on the lower part of the skull, were not valid. The best-fit line and all lines constructed as perpendiculars through midpoints between pairs of orbital landmarks showed excellent validity. Crista galli-anterior nasal spine and nasion-anterior nasal spine had the lowest validity and should not be used in cephalometric analysis of asymmetries. The position of anterior nasal spine will be altered in facial asymmetry involving the maxilla.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12750669     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2003.S0889540602570347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  24 in total

1.  Posteroanterior cephalometric changes in subjects with temporomandibular joint disorders.

Authors:  O C Almăşan; M Băciuţ; M Hedeşiu; S Bran; H Almăşan; G Băciuţ
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  A comparative study between data obtained from conventional lateral cephalometry and reconstructed three-dimensional computed tomography images.

Authors:  Suseok Oh; Ci-Young Kim; Jongrak Hong
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-06-27

3.  Deviation of landmarks in accordance with methods of establishing reference planes in three-dimensional facial CT evaluation.

Authors:  Kaeng Won Yoon; Suk-Ja Yoon; Byung-Cheol Kang; Young-Hee Kim; Min Suk Kook; Jae-Seo Lee; Juan Martin Palomo
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2014-09-17

4.  Dentofacial self-perception and social perception of adults with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Philipp Meyer-Marcotty; Angelika Stellzig-Eisenhauer
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Assessment of asymmetry in a normal occlusion sample and asymmetric patients with three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography: a study for a transverse reference plane.

Authors:  Je Uk Park; Yoon-Ah Kook; Yoonji Kim
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomographic image reorientation using soft tissues as reference for facial asymmetry diagnosis.

Authors:  Jae-Kyu Lee; Pil-Kyo Jung; Cheol-Hyun Moon
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Determination of midsagittal plane for evaluation of facial asymmetry using three-dimensional computed tomography.

Authors:  Tae-Young Kim; Jee-Seon Baik; Joo-Young Park; Hwa-Sung Chae; Kyung-Hoe Huh; Soon-Chul Choi
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2011-06-23

8.  A three-dimensional comparison of a morphometric and conventional cephalometric midsagittal planes for craniofacial asymmetry.

Authors:  Janalt Damstra; Zacharias Fourie; Marnix De Wit; Yijin Ren
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Localization of basicranium midline by submentovertex projection for the evaluation of condylar asymmetry.

Authors:  Michele Maglione; Fulvia Costantinides
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-01-18

10.  Biomechanical evaluation of the human mandible after temporomandibular joint replacement under different biting conditions.

Authors:  Manuel Pinheiro; Robin Willaert; Afaq Khan; Anouar Krairi; Wim Van Paepegem
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.