PURPOSE: To measure the thermal resistance (R(t)) and evaporative resistance (R(e,t)) of five different configurations of football uniforms commonly worn for American football practices and games. METHODS: The R(t) (insulation) of the ensembles was measured using an electrically heated manikin in thermal equilibrium with its surroundings. For the R(e,t) determinations, the manikin was covered with a cotton knit "skin" and sprayed with distilled water to simulate sweat-saturated skin. RESULTS: Compared with reference values for a T-shirt and shorts ensemble (R(t) = 0.140 m2. degrees C.W-1, R(e,t) = 0.020 m2.kPa-1.W-1), the R(t) of football uniforms ranged from 0.178 m2. degrees C.W-1 (1.15 clo) for a practice configuration of shorts, shoulder pads, practice jersey, and helmet to 0.233 m2. degrees C.W-1 (1.50 clo) for a full cold-weather uniform. Associated R(e,t) values ranged from 0.027 to 0.039 m2.kPa-1.W-1. CONCLUSION: Football uniforms contribute significantly to the heat load on a player. The thermal and evaporative resistance data presented in this paper can be used in the solution of heat balance equations to predict physiological responses of football players.
PURPOSE: To measure the thermal resistance (R(t)) and evaporative resistance (R(e,t)) of five different configurations of football uniforms commonly worn for American football practices and games. METHODS: The R(t) (insulation) of the ensembles was measured using an electrically heated manikin in thermal equilibrium with its surroundings. For the R(e,t) determinations, the manikin was covered with a cotton knit "skin" and sprayed with distilled water to simulate sweat-saturated skin. RESULTS: Compared with reference values for a T-shirt and shorts ensemble (R(t) = 0.140 m2. degrees C.W-1, R(e,t) = 0.020 m2.kPa-1.W-1), the R(t) of football uniforms ranged from 0.178 m2. degrees C.W-1 (1.15 clo) for a practice configuration of shorts, shoulder pads, practice jersey, and helmet to 0.233 m2. degrees C.W-1 (1.50 clo) for a full cold-weather uniform. Associated R(e,t) values ranged from 0.027 to 0.039 m2.kPa-1.W-1. CONCLUSION: Football uniforms contribute significantly to the heat load on a player. The thermal and evaporative resistance data presented in this paper can be used in the solution of heat balance equations to predict physiological responses of football players.
Authors: Samuel N Cheuvront; Daniel A Goodman; Robert W Kenefick; Scott J Montain; Michael N Sawka Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2007-12-04 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Andrew Grundstein; John A Knox; Jennifer Vanos; Earl R Cooper; Douglas J Casa Journal: Int J Biometeorol Date: 2017-03-17 Impact factor: 3.787
Authors: Susan Walker Yeargin; Douglas J Casa; Daniel A Judelson; Brendon P McDermott; Matthew S Ganio; Elaine C Lee; Rebecca M Lopez; Rebecca L Stearns; Jeffrey M Anderson; Lawrence E Armstrong; William J Kraemer; Carl M Maresh Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2010 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Sandra Fowkes Godek; Arthur R Bartolozzi; Richard Burkholder; Eric Sugarman; Chris Peduzzi Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2008 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.860