Literature DB >> 12750412

Activity profiles of single neurons in caudal anterior cingulate cortex during trace eyeblink conditioning in the rabbit.

Aldis P Weible1, Craig Weiss, John F Disterhoft.   

Abstract

Acquisition of trace eyeblink conditioning involves the association of a conditioned stimulus (CS) with an unconditioned stimulus (US) separated by a stimulus-free trace interval. This form of conditioning is dependent upon the hippocampus and the caudal anterior cingulate cortex (AC), in addition to brain stem and cerebellar circuitry. Hippocampal involvement in trace eyeblink conditioning has been studied extensively, but the involvement of caudal AC is less well understood. In the present study, we compared neuronal responses from rabbits given either paired (trace conditioning) or unpaired (pseudoconditioning) presentations of the CS and US. Presentation of the CS elicited significant increases in neuronal activity at the onset of both trace conditioning and pseudoconditioning. A robust CS-elicited neuronal response persisted throughout the first 2 days of trace conditioning, declining gradually across subsequent training sessions. In contrast, the magnitude of the CS-elicited excitatory response during pseudoconditioning began to decline within the first 10 trials. Neurons exhibiting excitatory responses to the CS during trace conditioning also exhibited excitatory responses to the US that were significantly greater in magnitude than US-elicited responses during pseudoconditioning. CS-elicited decreases in neuronal activity became more robust over the course of trace conditioning compared to pseudoconditioning. Reductions in activity during the CS interval consistently preceded excitation in both training groups, suggesting that the CS-elicited decreases in neuronal activity may serve to increase the signal-to-noise ratio of the excitatory response to the tone. Taken together, these data suggest that the caudal AC is involved early in trace eyeblink conditioning and that maintenance of the CS-elicited excitatory response may serve to signal the salience of the tone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12750412     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01097.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  45 in total

Review 1.  Exploring prefrontal cortical memory mechanisms with eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Craig Weiss; John F Disterhoft
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Transcranial direct-current stimulation modulates synaptic mechanisms involved in associative learning in behaving rabbits.

Authors:  Javier Márquez-Ruiz; Rocío Leal-Campanario; Raudel Sánchez-Campusano; Behnam Molaee-Ardekani; Fabrice Wendling; Pedro C Miranda; Giulio Ruffini; Agnès Gruart; José María Delgado-García
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Persistent activity in a cortical-to-subcortical circuit: bridging the temporal gap in trace eyelid conditioning.

Authors:  Jennifer J Siegel; Brian Kalmbach; Raymond A Chitwood; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Forebrain-Cerebellar Interactions During Learning.

Authors:  Craig Weiss; Aldis P Weible; Roberto Galvez; John F Disterhoft
Journal:  Cellscience       Date:  2006-10-27

5.  NMDA receptor-dependent processes in the medial prefrontal cortex are important for acquisition and the early stage of consolidation during trace, but not delay eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Kaori Takehara-Nishiuchi; Shigenori Kawahara; Yutaka Kirino
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Electrical stimulation of the rostral medial prefrontal cortex in rabbits inhibits the expression of conditioned eyelid responses but not their acquisition.

Authors:  Rocío Leal-Campanario; Alfonso Fairén; José M Delgado-García; Agnès Gruart
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Interactions between prefrontal cortex and cerebellum revealed by trace eyelid conditioning.

Authors:  Brian E Kalmbach; Tatsuya Ohyama; Joy C Kreider; Frank Riusech; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Classical eyeblink conditioning using electrical stimulation of caudal mPFC as conditioned stimulus is dependent on cerebellar interpositus nucleus in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Guang-yan Wu; Juan Yao; Zheng-li Fan; Lang-qian Zhang; Xuan Li; Chuang-dong Zhao; Zhen-hua Zhou; Jian-feng Sui
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  The role of the cerebellar interpositus nucleus in short and long term memory for trace eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Narawut Pakaprot; Soyun Kim; Richard F Thompson
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.912

10.  Age-related deficits in a forebrain-dependent task, trace-eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Roberto Galvez; Sabrina Cua; John F Disterhoft
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 4.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.