Literature DB >> 12748936

Recruiting vulnerable populations for research: revisiting the ethical issues.

Laura Bond Sutton1, Judith A Erlen, JoAnn M Glad, Laura A Siminoff.   

Abstract

The successful recruitment of participants is essential to the research process. To increase the rate of subject participation, investigators have to rely on help from health care providers who often serve as gatekeepers to potential research study subjects. These well-meaning professionals may limit subject participation in a study involving vulnerable populations under the guise of protecting these individuals from harm. We describe some of the characteristics of vulnerable populations affecting their recruitment into research studies. We examine the ethical conflicts that occur when health care professionals control access to these subjects during recruitment for research studies. Finally, we discuss the implications for practice and research designed to protect the rights of vulnerable populations participating in research. We identify collaboration and dialogue between researchers, health care providers, and members of the potential subject populations as most important in recruiting sufficient numbers of subjects to ensure the scientific merit of the study. Copyright 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12748936     DOI: 10.1053/jpnu.2003.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prof Nurs        ISSN: 8755-7223            Impact factor:   2.104


  13 in total

1.  To waiver or not to waiver? The dilemma of informed consent in emergency department suicide prevention research.

Authors:  Nicole Hill; Lynette Joubert; Carol Harvey; Graeme Hawthorne
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2011-08-31

2.  Serum concentrations of opioids when comparing two switching strategies to methadone for cancer pain.

Authors:  Kristin Moksnes; Stein Kaasa; Ørnulf Paulsen; Jan Henrik Rosland; Olav Spigset; Ola Dale
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Quality of life in terminal care--with special reference to age, gender and marital status.

Authors:  C Lundh Hagelin; Ake Seiger; C J Fürst
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Diversity and inclusion in simulation: addressing ethical and psychological safety concerns when working with simulated participants.

Authors:  Leanne Picketts; Marika Dawn Warren; Carrie Bohnert
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2021-05-06

5.  Recruitment and retention of older adolescent and young adult female survivors of childhood cancer in longitudinal research.

Authors:  Mary Ann Cantrell; Teresa Conte; Melissa Hudson; Aziza Shad; Kathy Ruble; Kaye Herth; Alyssa Canino; Sinead Kemmy
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  The childbearing health and related service needs of newcomers (CHARSNN) study protocol.

Authors:  Anita J Gagnon; Olive Wahoush; Geoffrey Dougherty; Jean-François Saucier; Cindy-Lee Dennis; Lisa Merry; Elizabeth Stanger; Donna E Stewart
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2006-12-26       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  The SALOME study: recruitment experiences in a clinical trial offering injectable diacetylmorphine and hydromorphone for opioid dependency.

Authors:  Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes; Kirsten Marchand; Kurt Lock; Scott MacDonald; Daphne Guh; Martin T Schechter
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2015-01-26

8.  Research involving adults lacking capacity to consent: the impact of research regulation on 'evidence biased' medicine.

Authors:  Victoria Shepherd
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Photo-elicitation with adolescents in qualitative research: an example of its use in exploring family interactions in adolescent psychiatry.

Authors:  J Sibeoni; E Costa-Drolon; L Poulmarc'h; S Colin; M Valentin; J Pradère; A Revah-Levy
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 3.033

10.  A screening tool for predicting gatekeeping behaviour.

Authors:  Austyn Snowden; Jenny Young
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2017-05-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.