Literature DB >> 12748256

Prognostic values of galectin-3 and the macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in human colorectal cancers.

Hugues Legendre1, Christine Decaestecker, Nathalie Nagy, Alain Hendlisz, Max-Peter Schüring, Isabelle Salmon, Hans-Joachim Gabius, Jean-Claude Pector, Robert Kiss.   

Abstract

This study aims to investigate whether the immunohistochemical levels of expression of galectin-3 and the macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) are associated with prognostic values in human colorectal tumors. This was performed on 99 specimens including 69 colorectal tumors (17 Dukes A, 19 Dukes B, 15 Dukes C and 18 metastatic tumors that we labeled as D), 10 hepatic metastases from colorectal cancers and 20 normal specimens (biopsies). The immunohistochemical levels of expression of MIF and galectin-3 were quantified on routine histological slides by means of computer-assisted microscopy. Separate analyses were performed on epithelial and connective tissue. The levels of expression of both MIF and galectin-3 were very significantly higher in epithelial tumor tissue when compared with normal epithelial specimens. A positive and significant correlation between MIF and galectin-3 expression was evidenced in connective tumor tissue, and in particular in the cases associated with short survival periods (less than 5 years). In the case of the Dukes A or B tumors, we established two new prognostic groups (labeled I and II) on the basis of the levels of galectin-3 expression measured in the tumor epithelium. In the case of the Dukes C or D tumors, we established two other prognostic groups (labeled III and IV) on the basis of the levels of MIF expression measured in the connective tissue. Kaplan-Meyer analyses confirmed the additional prognostic values (as compared with conventional clinical staging) given by this new classification (groups I to IV). They show that the Dukes A or B tumors characterized by low levels of galectin-3 expression in the tumor epithelium are associated with significantly better prognoses than those characterized by high levels. In addition, the Dukes C or D tumors characterized by high levels of MIF expression in the connective tumor tissue are associated with significantly better prognoses than those characterized by low levels. In conclusions, MIF and galectin-3 expression levels in colorectal tumors are related to their levels of biological aggressiveness. These markers could be used to identify patients at risk, for whom more aggressive adjuvant therapy seems to be indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12748256     DOI: 10.1097/01.MP.0000068235.45178.C1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  28 in total

1.  Clinicopathological significance of macrophage migration inhibitory factor and its relation with p53 in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Majid Nabizadeh Marvast; Hamid Reza Sima; Kamran Ghaffarzadehgan; Ali Taghizadeh Kermani; Nona Norouzi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2011-03

2.  Expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor is associated with enhanced angiogenesis and advanced stage in gastric carcinomas.

Authors:  Chia-Tung Shun; Jaw-Town Lin; Shih-Pei Huang; Min-Tsan Lin; Ming-Shiang Wu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Elevated expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor correlates with tumor recurrence and poor prognosis of patients with gliomas.

Authors:  Xiao-Bing Wang; Xiao-Ying Tian; Yang Li; Bin Li; Zhi Li
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-07-03       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Association Between Genetic Polymorphism of the MIF Gene and Colorectal Cancer in Taiwan.

Authors:  Latha Ramireddy; William Tzu-Liang Chen; Ching-Tien Peng; Rouh-Mei Hu; Tao-Wei Ke; Hua-Che Chiang; Sheng-Chi Chang; Fuu-Jen Tsai; Wan-Yu Lo
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 2.352

5.  Macrophage migration inhibitory factor as a potential prognostic factor in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Long-Jun He; Dan Xie; Pin-Jin Hu; Yi-Ji Liao; Hai-Xia Deng; Hsiang-Fu Kung; Sen-Lin Zhu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Carbohydrate recognition by boronolectins, small molecules, and lectins.

Authors:  Shan Jin; Yunfeng Cheng; Suazette Reid; Minyong Li; Binghe Wang
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 12.944

7.  A tautomerase-null macrophage migration-inhibitory factor (MIF) gene knock-in mouse model reveals that protein interactions and not enzymatic activity mediate MIF-dependent growth regulation.

Authors:  Günter Fingerle-Rowson; Dayananda Rao Kaleswarapu; Corinna Schlander; Nazanin Kabgani; Tania Brocks; Nina Reinart; Raymonde Busch; Anke Schütz; Hongqi Lue; Xin Du; Aihua Liu; Huabao Xiong; Yibang Chen; Alice Nemajerova; Michael Hallek; Jürgen Bernhagen; Lin Leng; Richard Bucala
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  The diagnostic value of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hakan Camlica; Derya Duranyildiz; Hilal Oguz; Ethem Nezih Oral; Vildan Yasasever
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 3.201

9.  Increased epithelial and serum expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in gastric cancer: potential role of MIF in gastric carcinogenesis.

Authors:  X-X He; J Yang; Y-W Ding; W Liu; Q-Y Shen; H H-X Xia
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Microarray-based cancer prediction using soft computing approach.

Authors:  Xiaosheng Wang; Osamu Gotoh
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2009-05-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.