BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is an advanced MR technique that describes the movement of water molecules by using two metrics, mean diffusivity (MD), and fractional anisotropy (FA), which represent the magnitude and directionality of water diffusion, respectively. We hypothesize that alterations in these values within the tissue surrounding brain tumors reflect combinations of increased water content and tumor infiltration and that these changes can be used to differentiate high-grade gliomas from metastatic lesions. METHODS: DTI was performed in 12 patients with high-grade gliomas and in 12 with metastatic lesions. DTI measurements were obtained from regions of interest (ROIs) placed on normal-appearing white matter and on the vasogenic edema, the T2 signal intensity abnormality surrounding each tumor. RESULTS: The peritumoral region of both gliomas and metastatic tumors displayed significant increases in MD (P <.005) and significant decreases in FA (P <.005) when compared with those of normal-appearing white matter. Furthermore, the peritumoral MD of metastatic lesions measured significantly greater than that of gliomas (P <.005). Peritumoral FA measurements, on the other hand, showed no such discrepancy. CONCLUSION: When compared with an internal control, diffusion metrics are clearly altered within the vasogenic edema surrounding both high-grade gliomas and metastatic tumors, reflecting increased extracellular water. Although peritumoral MD can be used to distinguish high-grade gliomas from metastatic tumors, peritumoral FA demonstrated no statistically significant difference. The FA changes surrounding gliomas, therefore, can be attributed not only to increased water content, but also to tumor infiltration.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is an advanced MR technique that describes the movement of water molecules by using two metrics, mean diffusivity (MD), and fractional anisotropy (FA), which represent the magnitude and directionality of water diffusion, respectively. We hypothesize that alterations in these values within the tissue surrounding brain tumors reflect combinations of increased water content and tumor infiltration and that these changes can be used to differentiate high-grade gliomas from metastatic lesions. METHODS: DTI was performed in 12 patients with high-grade gliomas and in 12 with metastatic lesions. DTI measurements were obtained from regions of interest (ROIs) placed on normal-appearing white matter and on the vasogenic edema, the T2 signal intensity abnormality surrounding each tumor. RESULTS: The peritumoral region of both gliomas and metastatic tumors displayed significant increases in MD (P <.005) and significant decreases in FA (P <.005) when compared with those of normal-appearing white matter. Furthermore, the peritumoral MD of metastatic lesions measured significantly greater than that of gliomas (P <.005). Peritumoral FA measurements, on the other hand, showed no such discrepancy. CONCLUSION: When compared with an internal control, diffusion metrics are clearly altered within the vasogenic edema surrounding both high-grade gliomas and metastatic tumors, reflecting increased extracellular water. Although peritumoral MD can be used to distinguish high-grade gliomas from metastatic tumors, peritumoral FA demonstrated no statistically significant difference. The FA changes surrounding gliomas, therefore, can be attributed not only to increased water content, but also to tumor infiltration.
Authors: R Bammer; M Augustin; S Strasser-Fuchs; T Seifert; P Kapeller; R Stollberger; F Ebner; H P Hartung; F Fazekas Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: T Sugahara; Y Korogi; M Kochi; I Ikushima; Y Shigematu; T Hirai; T Okuda; L Liang; Y Ge; Y Komohara; Y Ushio; M Takahashi Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: K Kono; Y Inoue; K Nakayama; M Shakudo; M Morino; K Ohata; K Wakasa; R Yamada Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2001 Jun-Jul Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: D J Werring; A T Toosy; C A Clark; G J Parker; G J Barker; D H Miller; A J Thompson Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: U C Wieshmann; M R Symms; G J Parker; C A Clark; L Lemieux; G J Barker; S D Shorvon Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Majda M Thurnher; Mauricio Castillo; Alfred Stadler; Armin Rieger; Brigitte Schmid; Pia C Sundgren Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Jiangyang Zhang; Peter C M van Zijl; John Laterra; Amandeep Salhotra; Bachchu Lal; Susumu Mori; Jinyuan Zhou Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Sumei Wang; Sungheon Kim; Sanjeev Chawla; Ronald L Wolf; Wei-Guo Zhang; Donald M O'Rourke; Kevin D Judy; Elias R Melhem; Harish Poptani Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-10-07 Impact factor: 6.556