Literature DB >> 12747495

Concurrent task effects on memory retrieval.

Doug Rohrer1, Harold E Pashler.   

Abstract

Previous studies combining continuous free recall with a concurrent task have generally shown that concurrent tasks impose fairly negligible effects on memory retrieval. By contrast, dual-task studies employing either cued recall or semantic retrieval reveal gross memory impairment and suggest that retrieval is delayed by the centrally demanding phase of the concurrent tasks (i.e., response selection). To explore this conflict, subjects performed continuous free recall while carrying out a serial-choice-response time (RT) task, as in the previous free recall studies. Unlike these previous studies, however, the choice-RT task utilized arbitrary stimulus-response mappings in order to increase the proportion of time devoted to the centrally demanding response selection phase. Recall total was reduced significantly, and recall latency was slowed substantially.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12747495     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  31 in total

1.  The effect of divided attention on encoding and retrieval in episodic memory revealed by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  T Iidaka; N D Anderson; S Kapur; R Cabeza; F I Craik
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory.

Authors:  G D Logan; M D Schulkind
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory.

Authors:  G D Logan; J A Delheimer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Analyzing the dynamics of free recall: An integrative review of the empirical literature.

Authors:  J T Wixted; D Rohrer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-03

5.  The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs.

Authors:  N D Anderson; F I Craik; M Naveh-Benjamin
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1998-09

6.  The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.

Authors:  F I Craik; R Govoni; M Naveh-Benjamin; N D Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1996-06

7.  When two memories can and cannot be retrieved concurrently.

Authors:  D Rohrer; H Pashler; J Etchegaray
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-07

8.  Retrieval strategies in recall of natural categories and categorized lists.

Authors:  S D Gronlund; R M Shiffrin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Divided attention: a vehicle for monitoring memory processes.

Authors:  W A Johnston; S N Greenberg; R P Fisher; D W Martin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-01

10.  Source memory and divided attention: reciprocal costs to primary and secondary tasks.

Authors:  A K Troyer; G Winocur; F I Craik; M Moscovitch
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  12 in total

1.  Response selection involves executive control: evidence from the selective interference paradigm.

Authors:  Arnaud Szmalec; André Vandierendonck; Eva Kemps
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-04

2.  Divided attention: an undesirable difficulty in memory retention.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Eric Ruthruff; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-10

3.  Concurrent task effects on memory encoding and retrieval: further support for an asymmetry.

Authors:  Moshe Naveh-Benjamin; Angela Kilb; Tyler Fisher
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-01

4.  Online response-selection and the attentional blink: Multiple-processing channels.

Authors:  John Serences; Miranda Scolari; Edward Awh
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2009

5.  The digital revolution and adolescent brain evolution.

Authors:  Jay N Giedd
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.012

6.  Paradoxical benefits of dual-task contexts for visuomotor memory.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Patrick Bédard
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-12-10

7.  Long lasting attentional-context dependent visuomotor memory.

Authors:  Hee Yeon Im; Patrick Bédard; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The effects of dividing attention on the encoding and performance of novel naturalistic actions.

Authors:  David A Gold; Norman W Park
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-04-29

9.  Effects of divided attention at encoding and retrieval: Further data.

Authors:  Fergus I M Craik; Eldar Eftekhari; Malcolm A Binns
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-11

10.  Visual attention and the neuroimage bias.

Authors:  D A Baker; N J Schweitzer; Evan F Risko; Jillian M Ware
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.