Literature DB >> 12746843

Prediction of extraprostatic cancer by prostate specific antigen density, endorectal MRI, and biopsy Gleason score in clinically localized prostate cancer.

Akio Horiguchi1, Jun Nakashima, Yutaka Horiguchi, Ken Nakagawa, Mototsugu Oya, Takashi Ohigashi, Ken Marumo, Masaru Murai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to identify the preoperative parameters, including PSA-based parameters, and endorectal MRI, predictive of pathological stage in males who underwent radical prostatectomy.
METHODS: We studied 114 patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Clinical stage was assessed by DRE, pelvic CT scan, endorectal MRI, and bone scan. The correlation between the preoperative parameters, including PSA-based parameters, clinical stage, and histological findings of biopsy specimens, and the pathological stage was analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify a significant set of independent predictors for local extent of disease.
RESULTS: Seventy-six (66.6%) patients had organ confined cancer and 38 (33.4%) patients had extraprostatic cancer. Of the 38 patients with extraprostatic cancer, four had seminal vesicle involvement, while, none had pelvic lymph node involvement. Biopsy Gleason score, PSA, PSA-alpha1-antichymotrypsin (PSA-ACT), PSA-density (PSAD), PSA-transition zone density, PSA-ACT density, and PSA-ACT transition zone (TZ) density were significantly higher and percent free PSA was lower in the patients with organ confined cancer than those with extraprostatic cancer (P < 0.01). PSAD showed the largest area under the ROC curve (AUC) among those parameters (AUC = 0.732). Sixty-eight (74.7%) of 91 patients with T2 on endorectal MRI had organ confined cancer, while 15 (65.2%) of 23 patients with T3 had extraprostatic cancer (P < 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that Gleason score (> or =7 vs. < or =6), endorectal MRI findings, and PSAD were significant predictors of extraprostatic cancer (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that preoperative PSAD was the most valuable predictor among PSA-based parameters for extraprostatic disease in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. The combination of PSAD, endorectal MRI findings, and biopsy Gleason score can provide additional information for selecting appropriate candidates for radical prostatectomy. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12746843     DOI: 10.1002/pros.10239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  6 in total

1.  Accuracy of preoperative endorectal MRI in predicting extracapsular extension and influence on neurovascular bundle sparing in radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Matthias C Roethke; Matthias P Lichy; Michaela Kniess; Matthias K Werner; Claus D Claussen; Arnulf Stenzl; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; David Schilling
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  PSA density is superior than PSA and Gleason score for adverse pathologic features prediction in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Petros Perimenis
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Prostate-specific antigen density predicts extracapsular extension and increased risk of biochemical recurrence in patients with high-risk prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Takuya Koie; Koji Mitsuzuka; Takahiro Yoneyama; Shintaro Narita; Sadafumi Kawamura; Yasuhiro Kaiho; Norihiko Tsuchiya; Tatsuo Tochigi; Tomonori Habuchi; Yoichi Arai; Chikara Ohyama; Tohru Yoneyama; Yuki Tobisawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Preoperative predictive factors and further risk stratification of biochemical recurrence in clinically localized high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Riu Hamada; Jun Nakashima; Makoto Ohori; Yoshio Ohno; Osamu Komori; Kunihiro Yoshioka; Masaaki Tachibana
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Impact of Gleason score of the tumor at the positive surgical margin as a prognostic factor.

Authors:  Hirofumi Kurose; Kosuke Ueda; Naoyuki Ogasawara; Katsuaki Chikui; Makoto Nakiri; Kiyoaki Nishihara; Mitsunori Matsuo; Shigetaka Suekane; Hironori Kusano; Jun Akiba; Hirohisa Yano; Tsukasa Igawa
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-02-10

Review 6.  Imaging in genitourinary cancer from the urologists' perspective.

Authors:  P Tsakiris; J de la Rosette
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-05-28       Impact factor: 3.909

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.