Literature DB >> 12746449

A carboxyl-terminal mutation of the epidermal growth factor receptor alters tyrosine kinase activity and substrate specificity as measured by a fluorescence polarization assay.

Jane A Beebe1, Gregory J Wiepz, Arturo G Guadarrama, Paul J Bertics, Thomas J Burke.   

Abstract

The expression of certain COOH-terminal truncation mutants of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) can lead to cell transformation, and with ligand stimulation, a broader spectrum of phosphorylated proteins appears compared with EGF-treated cells expressing wild-type EGFR. Accordingly, it has been proposed that elements within the COOH terminus may determine substrate specificity of the EGFR tyrosine kinase (Decker, S. J., Alexander, C., and Habib, T. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 1104-1108; Walton, G. M., Chen, W. S., Rosenfeld, M. G., and Gill, G. N. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 1750-1754). To address this hypothesis, we analyzed in vitro the steady-state kinetic parameters for phosphorylation of several substrates by both wild-type EGFR and an oncogenic EGFR mutant (the ct1022 mutant) truncated at residue 1022. The substrates included: (i) a phospholipase C-gamma fragment (residues 530-850); (ii) the 46-kDa isoform of the Shc adapter protein; (iii) a 13-residue peptide mimic for the region around the major autophosphorylation tyrosine and the Shc binding site (the Y1173 peptide); (iv) a poly(Glu,Tyr) 4:1 copolymer; and (v) the 8-residue peptide, angiotensin II. Our data demonstrate that the steady-state kinetic parameters for the ct1022 mutant differ from those of the wild-type enzyme, and the differences are substrate-dependent. These results support the concept that this oncogenic truncation/mutation alters EGFR substrate specificity, rather than causing a general alteration of activity. We performed the experiments using a non-radioactive fluorescence polarization assay that quantifies the degree of phosphorylation of peptide as well as natural substrates. The results are consistent with those from the traditional [gamma-32P]ATP/filtration assay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12746449     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M301397200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  3 in total

1.  Glioblastoma-derived epidermal growth factor receptor carboxyl-terminal deletion mutants are transforming and are sensitive to EGFR-directed therapies.

Authors:  Jeonghee Cho; Sandra Pastorino; Qing Zeng; Xiaoyin Xu; William Johnson; Scott Vandenberg; Roel Verhaak; Andrew D Cherniack; Hideo Watanabe; Amit Dutt; Jihyun Kwon; Ying S Chao; Robert C Onofrio; Derek Chiang; Yuki Yuza; Santosh Kesari; Matthew Meyerson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Phosphoproteomics-based modeling defines the regulatory mechanism underlying aberrant EGFR signaling.

Authors:  Shinya Tasaki; Masao Nagasaki; Hiroko Kozuka-Hata; Kentaro Semba; Noriko Gotoh; Seisuke Hattori; Jun-ichiro Inoue; Tadashi Yamamoto; Satoru Miyano; Sumio Sugano; Masaaki Oyama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Fluorescence Polarization-Based Bioassays: New Horizons.

Authors:  Olga D Hendrickson; Nadezhda A Taranova; Anatoly V Zherdev; Boris B Dzantiev; Sergei A Eremin
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 3.576

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.