Literature DB >> 12746129

Effect of deep-frying fish on risk from mercury.

Joanna Burger1, Carline Dixon, C Shane Boring, Michael Gochfeld.   

Abstract

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and many states have issued advisories to limit or avoid the consumption of certain fish or fish from certain waters, particularly by pregnant women and young children or even women of childbearing age. Typically, risk is calculated by multiplying contaminant concentrations in fish tissue, frequency of meals, and meal size, compared to some criterion, usually the U.S. EPA reference dose (RfD). Site-specific data on mercury concentrations, meal size, and consumption frequency by fishermen were used to determine how frying fish affected risk estimates. In consumption studies fishermen typically estimate the size of portions as they appear on the plate (i.e., cooked), yet assessors calculate risk based on contaminant levels in uncooked fish. Largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides, n = 39) were collected from the contaminated L Lake on the Savannah River Site, South Carolina. Fillets from the opposite sides of the same fish were divided and randomly assigned to a raw or fried treatment (the commonly used local cooking method). The fried fillet was further divided in half for a breaded or nonbreaded treatment. Mercury averaged 0.44 microg/g (ppm, wet weight) in raw fish, 0.63 microg/g in fried and breaded fish, and 0.76 microg/g in fried, unbreaded fish. The maximum concentration was 1.5 microg/g in raw fish (1.9 microg/g in cooked fish). Deep-frying with and without breading resulted in weight loss of 25% and 39%, while mercury levels increased by 45% and 75%, perhaps due to the breading and absorption of oil. At the mean fish

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12746129     DOI: 10.1080/15287390306382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A        ISSN: 0098-4108


  9 in total

Review 1.  Sources of Mercury Exposure to Children in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Rita Ann Kampalath; Jennifer Ayla Jay
Journal:  J Health Pollut       Date:  2015-07-02

Review 2.  Nutritional epidemiology of type 2 diabetes and depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Akiko Nanri
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 3.211

Review 3.  A Review of Mercury Bioavailability in Humans and Fish.

Authors:  Mark A Bradley; Benjamin D Barst; Niladri Basu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Mislabelling and high mercury content hampers the efforts of market-based seafood initiatives in Peru.

Authors:  Daniella Biffi; Andrea López-Mobilia; Shaleyla Kelez; Dean A Williams; Matthew M Chumchal; Molly Weinburgh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Risk of Mercury Ingestion from Canned Fish in Poland.

Authors:  Aleksandra Pawlaczyk; Anna Przerywacz; Magdalena Gajek; Malgorzata Iwona Szynkowska-Jozwik
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  The risk of mercury exposure to the people consuming fish from Lake Phewa, Nepal.

Authors:  Devna Singh Thapa; Chhatra Mani Sharma; Shichang Kang; Mika Sillanpää
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Frequency of fish intake and diabetes among adult Indians.

Authors:  Sutapa Agrawal; Christopher Millett; S V Subramanian; Shah Ebrahim
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 8.  The association between types of seafood intake and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Nazli Namazi; Neil R Brett; Nick Bellissimo; Bagher Larijani; Javad Heshmati; Leila Azadbakht
Journal:  Health Promot Perspect       Date:  2019-08-06

9.  Effects of Speciation, Cooking and Changes in Bioaccessibility on Methylmercury Exposure Assessment for Contrasting Diets of Fish and Marine Mammals.

Authors:  Tania Charette; Gregory Kaminski; Maikel Rosabal; Marc Amyot
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.