Literature DB >> 12745979

Effects of wearing aircrew protective clothing on physiological and cognitive responses under various ambient conditions.

Hilde Faerevik1, Randi Eidsmo Reinertsen.   

Abstract

Heat stress can be a significant problem for pilots wearing protective clothing during flights, because they provide extra insulation which prevents evaporative heat loss. Heat stress can influence human cognitive activity, which might be critical in the flying situation, requiring efficient and error-free performance. This study investigated the effect of wearing protective clothing under various ambient conditions on physiological and cognitive performance. On several occasions, eight subjects were exposed for 3 h to three different environmental conditions; 0 degrees C at 80% RH, 23 degrees C at 63% RH and 40 degrees C at 19% RH. The subjects were equipped with thermistors, dressed as they normally do for flights (including helmet, two layers of underwear and an uninsulated survival suit). During three separate exposures the subjects carried out two cognitive performance tests (Vigilance test and DG test). Performance was scored as correct, incorrect, missed reaction and reaction time. Skin temperature, deep body temperature, heart rate, oxygen consumption, temperature and humidity inside the clothing, sweat loss, subjective sensation of temperature and thermal comfort were measured. Rises in rectal temperature, skin temperature, heart rate and body water loss indicated a high level of heat stress in the 40 degrees C ambient temperature condition in comparison with 0 degrees C and 23 degrees C. Performance of the DG test was unaffected by ambient temperature. However, the number of incorrect reactions in the Vigilance test was significantly higher at 40 degrees C than at 23 degrees C (p = 0.006) or 0 degrees C (p = 0.03). The effect on Vigilance performance correlated with changes in deep-body temperature, and this is in accordance with earlier studies that have demonstrated that cognitive performance is virtually unaffected unless environmental conditions are sufficient to change deep body temperature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12745979     DOI: 10.1080/0014013031000085644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

1.  Exertional thermal strain, protective clothing and auxiliary cooling in dry heat: evidence for physiological but not cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Joanne N Caldwell; Mark J Patterson; Nigel A S Taylor
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Adaptation rate of 6-sulfatoxymelatonin and cognitive performance in offshore fleet shift workers: a field study.

Authors:  Jakob H Hansen; Ingunn H Geving; Randi E Reinertsen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Repeat work bouts increase thermal strain for Australian firefighters working in the heat.

Authors:  Anthony Walker; Christos Argus; Matthew Driller; Ben Rattray
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2015-04-07

4.  Effects of heat strain on cognitive function among a sample of miners.

Authors:  Kristin Yeoman; Alyssa Weakley; Weston DuBose; Kimberly Honn; Timothy McMurry; Brianna Eiter; Brent Baker; Gerald Poplin
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.940

5.  Cognitive Performance During Night Work in the Cold.

Authors:  Hilde Færevik; Jakob Hønborg Hansen; Øystein Wiggen; Mariann Sandsund
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  The maximum evaporative potential of constant wear immersion suits influences the risk of excessive heat strain for helicopter aircrew.

Authors:  Andrew P Hunt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Per-Cooling (Using Cooling Systems during Physical Exercise) Enhances Physical and Cognitive Performances in Hot Environments. A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Wafa Douzi; Olivier Dupuy; Dimitri Theurot; Juhani Smolander; Benoit Dugué
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.