Anna Cristina Aberg1, Birgitta Lindmark, Hans Lithell. 1. Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Section of Geriatrics, Uppsala University, PO Box 609 S-751 25, Uppsala, Sweden. ann-cristin.aberg@pubcare.uu.se
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop a scale for assessment of three components-dependence, pain and insecurity - related to motor functions of importance for activities of daily living among older rehabilitation patients and to establish its clinical practicality and reliability. METHOD: A General Motor Function Assessment Scale (GMF) with the above aims was constructed. Clinical practicality was explored by questionnaires to 14 physiotherapists. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability was tested on patients in three different forms of geriatric rehabilitation (n=20-25) and analysed by percentage agreement (PA) and a non-parametric statistical method, which provide measures of the random disagreement separately from the systematic part of the disagreement. RESULTS: In the clinical test the GMF was found to be time efficient and clinically adequate. Analysis of reliability showed overall high values of PA (PA> or =70) and of the rank-order agreement coefficient (r(a)>0.82), and low degrees of systematic disagreement. CONCLUSIONS: GMF was found to be a clinically useful assessment scale in geriatric rehabilitation. The statistical analyses indicted a high degree of reliability. Comparison of these results with reliability of comparable rating scales is difficult on account of the statistical methods used in other studies, which commonly do not take into account the non-metric properties of the data.
PURPOSE: To develop a scale for assessment of three components-dependence, pain and insecurity - related to motor functions of importance for activities of daily living among older rehabilitation patients and to establish its clinical practicality and reliability. METHOD: A General Motor Function Assessment Scale (GMF) with the above aims was constructed. Clinical practicality was explored by questionnaires to 14 physiotherapists. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability was tested on patients in three different forms of geriatric rehabilitation (n=20-25) and analysed by percentage agreement (PA) and a non-parametric statistical method, which provide measures of the random disagreement separately from the systematic part of the disagreement. RESULTS: In the clinical test the GMF was found to be time efficient and clinically adequate. Analysis of reliability showed overall high values of PA (PA> or =70) and of the rank-order agreement coefficient (r(a)>0.82), and low degrees of systematic disagreement. CONCLUSIONS:GMF was found to be a clinically useful assessment scale in geriatric rehabilitation. The statistical analyses indicted a high degree of reliability. Comparison of these results with reliability of comparable rating scales is difficult on account of the statistical methods used in other studies, which commonly do not take into account the non-metric properties of the data.
Authors: Anna Cristina Aberg; Birgitta Sidenvall; Mike Hepworth; Karen O'Reilly; Hans Lithell Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Hanna B Åhman; Ylva Cedervall; Lena Kilander; Vilmantas Giedraitis; Lars Berglund; Kevin J McKee; Erik Rosendahl; Martin Ingelsson; Anna Cristina Åberg Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Hanna B Åhman; Lars Berglund; Ylva Cedervall; Lena Kilander; Vilmantas Giedraitis; Kevin J McKee; Martin Ingelsson; Erik Rosendahl; Anna Cristina Åberg Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Hanna B Åhman; Lars Berglund; Ylva Cedervall; Vilmantas Giedraitis; Kevin J McKee; Erik Rosendahl; Anna Cristina Åberg Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2021-10-01