Literature DB >> 12745691

Environmental and human factors influencing thermal comfort of office occupants in hot - humid and hot - arid climates.

Tamara Erlandson1, Krzysztof Cena, Richard De Dear, George Havenith.   

Abstract

The effects of environmental and individual factors on thermal sensation in air-conditioned office environments were analysed for two large, fully compatible thermal comfort field studies in contrasting Australian climates. In the hot - humid location of Townsville, 836 office workers were surveyed; 935 workers participated in hot - arid Kalgoorlie-Boulder. Overall perceived work area temperature and measured indoor operative temperature correlated moderately with thermal sensation for Townsville (T) subjects but only perceived temperature correlated with Kalgoorlie-Boulder (KB) sensation. Multiple regression analyses confirmed that indoor climatic variables (including Predicted Mean Vote) contributed to actual thermal sensation vote (24% T; 15% KB), with operative temperature having more of an effect in T than in KB. Subsequent analyses of individual characteristics showed no linear contributions to thermal sensation. The remaining variances were significantly related to perceived work area temperature (7% additional explained variance in T; 12% in KB). Mann - Whitney analyses (after correction for climatic variables) showed that T subjects with higher job satisfaction had thermal sensations closer to 'neutral'. Males, healthier subjects, non-smokers, respondents with earlier survey times and underweight occupants had lower median thermal sensations in KB. Townsville occupants appeared more adapted to their outdoor climatic conditions than Kalgoorlie-Boulder respondents, perhaps due to limited home air-conditioning. Further research into non-thermal impacts on gender-related thermal acceptability is suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12745691     DOI: 10.1080/0014013031000085707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Part A: Assessing the performance of the COMFA outdoor thermal comfort model on subjects performing physical activity.

Authors:  Natasha A Kenny; Jon S Warland; Robert D Brown; Terry G Gillespie
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Analysis of the Impact of Selected Physical Environmental Factors on the Health of Employees: Creating a Classification Model Using a Decision Tree.

Authors:  Miriam Andrejiová; Miriama Piňosová; Ružena Králiková; Bystrík Dolník; Pavol Liptai; Erika Dolníková
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Toward a Mechanistic Understanding of Environmentally Forced Zoonotic Disease Emergence: Sin Nombre Hantavirus.

Authors:  Scott Carver; James N Mills; Cheryl A Parmenter; Robert R Parmenter; Kyle S Richardson; Rachel L Harris; Richard J Douglass; Amy J Kuenzi; Angela D Luis
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 8.589

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.