Literature DB >> 12745222

Establishing the fitness for purpose of mass spectrometric methods.

Robert Bethem1, Joe Boison, Jane Gale, David Heller, Steven Lehotay, Joseph Loo, Steven Musser, Phil Price, Stephen Stein.   

Abstract

This report is submitted by a working group sponsored by the ASMS Measurements and Standards Committee. The group responded to a 1998 opinion piece dealing with mass spectrometry in trace analysis (Bethem, R. A.; Boyd, R. K. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 9, 643-648) which proposed that the concept of fitness for purpose addresses the needs of a wide range of analytical problems. There is a need to define fitness for purpose within the current context of mass spectrometry and to recommend processes for developing and evaluating methods according to suitability for a particular purpose. The key element in our proposal is for the interested parties to define in advance the acceptable degree of measurement uncertainty and the desired degree of identification confidence. These choices can serve as guideposts during method development and targets for retrospective evaluation of methods. A series of more detailed recommendations are derived from basic principles and also from reviews of current practice. This report highlights some areas where consensus is evident, but also revealed the need for further work in other areas. The recommendations are aimed primarily for the laboratory analyst but we hope they will be accessible to the non-scientist as well. Our goal was to provide a framework that can support informed decisions and foster discussion of the issues, because ultimately it is the responsibility of the analyst to make choices, provide supporting data, and interpret results according to scientific principles and qualified judgment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12745222     DOI: 10.1016/S1044-0305(03)00137-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  3 in total

1.  Mass spectrometric confirmation criterion for product-ion spectra generated in flow-injection analysis. Environmental application.

Authors:  R B Geerdink; W M Niessen; U A Brinkman
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2001-03-02       Impact factor: 4.759

2.  Use of mass spectrometry for confirmation of animal drug residues.

Authors:  J A Sphon
Journal:  J Assoc Off Anal Chem       Date:  1978-09

3.  Optimizing the balance between false positive and false negative error probabilities of confirmatory methods for the detection of veterinary drug residues.

Authors:  W J de Boer; H van der Voet; W G de Ruig; J A van Rhijn; K M Cooper; D G Kennedy; R K Patel; S Porter; T Reuvers; V Marcos; P Muñoz; J Bosch; P Rodríguez; J M Grases
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.616

  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  On the risk of false positive identification using multiple ion monitoring in qualitative mass spectrometry: large-scale intercomparisons with a comprehensive mass spectral library.

Authors:  Stephen E Stein; David N Heller
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Automated detection of inaccurate and imprecise transitions in peptide quantification by multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Susan E Abbatiello; D R Mani; Hasmik Keshishian; Steven A Carr
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  The (un)certainty of selectivity in liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Bjorn J A Berendsen; Linda A M Stolker; Michel W F Nielen
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Targeted peptide measurements in biology and medicine: best practices for mass spectrometry-based assay development using a fit-for-purpose approach.

Authors:  Steven A Carr; Susan E Abbatiello; Bradley L Ackermann; Christoph Borchers; Bruno Domon; Eric W Deutsch; Russell P Grant; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Ruth Hüttenhain; John M Koomen; Daniel C Liebler; Tao Liu; Brendan MacLean; D R Mani; Elizabeth Mansfield; Hendrik Neubert; Amanda G Paulovich; Lukas Reiter; Olga Vitek; Ruedi Aebersold; Leigh Anderson; Robert Bethem; Josip Blonder; Emily Boja; Julianne Botelho; Michael Boyne; Ralph A Bradshaw; Alma L Burlingame; Daniel Chan; Hasmik Keshishian; Eric Kuhn; Christopher Kinsinger; Jerry S H Lee; Sang-Won Lee; Robert Moritz; Juan Oses-Prieto; Nader Rifai; James Ritchie; Henry Rodriguez; Pothur R Srinivas; R Reid Townsend; Jennifer Van Eyk; Gordon Whiteley; Arun Wiita; Susan Weintraub
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  Semantic divergence in clinical education: Student-centered or student democracy.

Authors:  Seyyed Mohammad Khademolhosseini; Zohreh Vanaki; Robabeh Memarian; Abass Ebadi
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2012-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.