| Literature DB >> 12744962 |
Mark S Seidenberg1, Aimee Arnoldussen.
Abstract
The Beretta et al. study tested an invalid prediction concerning connectionist models of inflectional morphology and the study exhibits a confound between type of stimulus (regular, irregular) and processing difficulty (easy, hard) that invalidates their conclusions. Harder stimuli produced greater activation across a broader range of brain areas, as in previous studies, but the data have no bearing on the rules vs. connections debate.Mesh:
Year: 2003 PMID: 12744962 DOI: 10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00065-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Lang ISSN: 0093-934X Impact factor: 2.381