Literature DB >> 12744889

The incidence of shingles and its implications for vaccination policy.

Rachel S Chapman1, Kenneth W Cross, Douglas M Fleming.   

Abstract

A vaccine is now available to prevent varicella-zoster infection, but its place in routine preventive care is not yet determined. The age specific incidence of shingles was examined separately by gender and age groups (15-24, 25-44, 45-64, 65-74 and 75 years and more) over the years 1994-2001. These incidence data were applied to national available data for the UK on current life expectancy to calculate the risk of shingles infections at varying ages. The potential benefit of an effective vaccine was estimated using three models of vaccine efficacy applied separately to males and females at ages 50, 60 and 65 years and assuming vaccination at a single age. Similar calculations were made using a two dose strategy at age 45 and 65 years and at age 50 and 70 years. The cost per case saved was estimated from a vaccination cost of pound 40 per dose. The probability of having had an attack of shingles before age 45 years is 8.6% for males and 10.5% for females, The risk of acquiring shingles over an expected lifetime (assuming no preventive vaccination) for males aged 45 years is 22% and for females 32%. Whichever vaccine efficacy model was chosen, a single vaccination policy at age 65 years was the most favourable option in both males and females. A two age vaccination policy was estimated to increase the cost per case saved by 30% over a single age policy but administration at age 50 and 70 years substantially increased the number of cases saved as compared with a single age policy and was potentially better than vaccination at 45 and 65 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12744889     DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(03)00034-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  20 in total

Review 1.  Managing ophthalmic herpes zoster in primary care.

Authors:  Wim Opstelten; Michel J W Zaal
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-07-16

2.  Secular trends in the epidemiology of shingles in Alberta.

Authors:  M L Russell; D P Schopflocher; L Svenson; S N Virani
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 2.451

3.  Comparing shingles incidence and complication rates from medical record review and administrative database estimates: how close are they?

Authors:  Barbara P Yawn; Peter Wollan; Jennifer St Sauver
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Zoster duplex: a clinical report and etiologic analysis.

Authors:  Feng Zhang; Jin Zhou
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

5.  Incidence of herpes zoster ophthalmicus: results from the Pacific Ocular Inflammation Study.

Authors:  Durga S Borkar; Vivien M Tham; Elizabeth Esterberg; Kathryn J Ray; Aleli C Vinoya; John V Parker; Aileen Uchida; Nisha R Acharya
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Herpes simplex virus and varicella zoster virus, the house guests who never leave.

Authors:  Paul R Kinchington; Anthony J St Leger; Jean-Marc G Guedon; Robert L Hendricks
Journal:  Herpesviridae       Date:  2012-06-12

7.  Exploring the Seasonal Drivers of Varicella Zoster Virus Transmission and Reactivation.

Authors:  Kevin M Bakker; Marisa C Eisenberg; Robert Woods; Micaela E Martinez
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 5.363

8.  Reducing pain in acute herpes zoster with plain occlusive dressings: a case report.

Authors:  David A Keegan
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2015-04-25

9.  Prevention of shingles: safety and efficacy of live zoster vaccine.

Authors:  Dianna Quan; Randall J Cohrs; Ravi Mahalingam; Donald H Gilden
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Annual incidence rates of herpes zoster among an immunocompetent population in the United States.

Authors:  Barbara H Johnson; Liisa Palmer; Justin Gatwood; Gregory Lenhart; Kosuke Kawai; Camilo J Acosta
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.