Literature DB >> 12744877

Effect of priming/booster immunisation protocols on immune response to canine parvovirus peptide induced by vaccination with a chimaeric plant virus construct.

B L Nicholas1, F R Brennan, W D O Hamilton, D Wakelin.   

Abstract

Expression of a 17-mer peptide sequence from canine parvovirus expressed on cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV) to form chimaeric virus particles (CVPs) creates vaccine antigens that elicit strong anti-peptide immune responses in mice. Systemic (subcutaneous, s.c.) immunisation and boosting with such CVP constructs produces IgG(2a) serum antibody responses, while mucosal (intranasal, i.n.) immunisation and boosting elicits intestinal IgA responses. Combinations of systemic and mucosal routes for priming and boosting immunisations were used to examine their influence on the level, type and location of immune response generated to one of these constructs (CVP-1). In all cases, s.c. administration, whether for immunisation or boosting, generated a Th1-biased response, reflected in a predominantly IgG(2a) serum antibody isotype and secretion of IFN-gamma from in vitro-stimulated lymphocytes. Serum antibody responses were greatest in animals primed and boosted subcutaneously, and least in mucosally vaccinated mice. The i.n. exposure also led to IFN-gamma release from in vitro-stimulated cells, but serum IgG(2a) was significantly elevated only in mice primed intranasally and boosted subcutaneously. Peptide- and wild-type CPMV-specific IgA responses in gut lavage fluid were greatest in animals exposed mucosally and least in those primed and boosted subcutaneously or primed subcutaneously and boosted orally. Lymphocytes from immunised mice proliferated in response to in vitro stimulation with CPMV but not with peptide. The predominant secretion of IFN-gamma from all immunising/boosting combinations indicates that the route of vaccination and challenge does not alter the Th1 bias of the response to CVP constructs. However, optimal serum and intestinal antibody responses were achieved by combining s.c. and i.n. administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12744877     DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(03)00054-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  4 in total

1.  Inactivation and purification of cowpea mosaic virus-like particles displaying peptide antigens from Bacillus anthracis.

Authors:  Jamie P Phelps; Nghiep Dang; Lada Rasochova
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 2.014

Review 2.  Plant Viruses as Nanoparticle-Based Vaccines and Adjuvants.

Authors:  Marie-Ève Lebel; Karine Chartrand; Denis Leclerc; Alain Lamarre
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2015-08-05

Review 3.  Virus-like particles as a highly efficient vaccine platform: diversity of targets and production systems and advances in clinical development.

Authors:  Natasha Kushnir; Stephen J Streatfield; Vidadi Yusibov
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 4.  Plant production of veterinary vaccines and therapeutics.

Authors:  R W Hammond; L G Nemchinov
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.291

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.