| Literature DB >> 12744727 |
Mário V Baio1, Fernando B Noll, Ronaldo Zucchi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Swarm-founding epiponine wasps are an intriguing group of social insects in which colonies are polygynic (several queens share reproduction) and differentiation between castes is often not obvious. However, caste differences in some may be more pronounced in later phases of the colony cycle.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2003 PMID: 12744727 PMCID: PMC165425 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-3-10
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Number of combs, brood production, and colony population in the analyzed colonies of Metapolybia docilis. Percentage in parentheses.
| Nest Location | Colony phase | Cells | Estimated n. of generations | Females | Males | |||||
| Empty | with eggs | With larvae | With pupae | total | Workers | Queens | ||||
| Igaçaba – São Paulo State | Worker-producing | 123 | 108 | 268 | 321 | 820 | 1 | 197 | 23 | 0 |
| (15.0) | (13.2) | (32.7) | (39.2) | (89.6) | (10.5) | |||||
| Igaçaba – São Paulo State | Male-producing | 313 | 42 | 26 | 6 | 387 | 2 | 165 | 4 | 7 |
| (79.9) | (10.9) | (6.7) | (1.6) | (93.8) | (2.3) | (3.98) | ||||
| Pedregulho – São Paulo State | Pre-emergence | 41 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 64 | 9 | 0 |
| (68.3) | (31.7) | (87.7) | (12.3) | |||||||
| Nova Xavantina – Mato Grosso State | absconding | - | - | - | - | - | - | 44 | 1 | 0 |
| (97.8) | (2.2) | |||||||||
| Ribeirão Preto – São Paulo State | Swarm | - | - | - | - | - | - | 11 | 7 | 0 |
| (61.1) | (38.9) | |||||||||
Figure 1Frequency of queens (White bars) and workers (dark bars) according to the color patterns of the transverse apodeme from the 4th gastral sternite in Metapolybia docilis in different analyzed colonies. LY – light yellow, LB – light brown, DB – dark brown, B – black.
Queen and worker means (in mm), Bonferroni t-test and ANCOVA analyses for each morphometrical variable in Metapolybia docilis.
| Colony Phase | Characters | Means ± SD | Bonferroni t-test | ANCOVA (AL as covariate) | ||||||
| Queens | Workers | F | P>F | MS Effect | MS Error | F | ||||
| Pre-emergence | 9 queens and 64 workers | |||||||||
| HL | 2.00 ± 0.06 | 1.95 ± 0.07 | 1.89 | 0.06 | ||||||
| HW | 2.42 ± 0.06 | 2.41 ± 0.07 | 0.63 | 0.53 | ||||||
| IDm | 1.00 ± 0.04 | 0.99 ± 0.04 | 0.25 | 0.80 | ||||||
| PW | 1.86 ± 0.07 | 1.83 ± 0.06 | 1.79 | 0.08 | ||||||
| MTL | 0.48 ± 0.03 | 0.47 ± 0.03 | 0.72 | 0.48 | ||||||
| AL | 2.97 ± 0.12 | 2.90 ± 0.14 | 1.53 | 0.13 | ||||||
| T2H* | 2.02 ± 0.06 | 1.90 ± 0.10 | 3.19 | 0.002 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 7.91 | 0.01 | ||
| T1L* | 2.22 ± 0.04 | 2.16 ± 0.08 | 2.20 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.003 | 2.41 | 0.13 | ||
| T2BW | 0.50 ± 0.02 | 0.49 ± 0.04 | 0.77 | 0.45 | ||||||
| WL | 4.48 ± 0.10 | 4.40 ± 0.13 | 1.72 | 0.09 | ||||||
| Worker-producing | 23 queens and 30 workers | HL | 2.03 ± 0.04 | 2.02 ± 0.03 | 1.66 | 0.10 | ||||
| HW | 2.44 ± 0.04 | 2.46 ± 0.05 | -1.26 | 0.21 | ||||||
| IDm | 1.04 ± 0.02 | 1.04 ± 0.03 | 1.58 | 0.12 | ||||||
| PW | 1.28 ± 0.04 | 1.29 ± 0.07 | -0.53 | 0.60 | ||||||
| MTL* | 0.50 ± 0.02 | 0.53 ± 0.03 | -3.00 | 0.004 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 11.40 | |||
| AL | 3.25 ± 0.07 | 3.24 ± 0.09 | 0.60 | 0.55 | ||||||
| T2H* | 2.11 ± 0.08 | 1.96 ± 0.07 | 7.55 | <0.001 | 0.31 | 0.005 | 62.74 | |||
| T1L | 2.25 ± 0.04 | 2.23 ± 0.06 | 1.44 | 0.16 | ||||||
| T2BW | 0.51 ± 0.02 | 0.50 ± 0.02 | 1.74 | 0.09 | ||||||
| WL | 4.56 ± 0.08 | 4.54 ± 0.10 | 0.62 | 0.54 | ||||||
| Male-producing | 4 queens and 30 workers | HL | 1.95 ± 0.05 | 2.00 ± 0.04 | 1.98 | 0.06 | ||||
| HW | 2.43 ± 0.07 | 2.45 ± 0.03 | 0.82 | 0.42 | ||||||
| IDm | 1.03 ± 0.03 | 1.03 ± 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.90 | ||||||
| PW* | 1.42 ± 0.05 | 1.27 ± 0.04 | -5.69 | <0.001 | 0.08 | 0.002 | 41.39 | <0.001 | ||
| MTL | 0.54 ± 0.03 | 0.53 ± 0.03 | -0.80 | 0.43 | ||||||
| AL | 3.06 ± 0.15 | 3.15 ± 0.09 | 1.73 | 0.09 | ||||||
| T2H | 1.98 ± 0.07 | 2.02 ± 0.11 | 0.60 | 0.55 | ||||||
| T1L | 2.20 ± 0.12 | 2.23 ± 0.05 | 1.02 | 0.32 | ||||||
| T2BW | 0.50 ± 0.00 | 0.48 ± 0.02 | -0.85 | 0.40 | ||||||
| WL | 4.53 ± 0.16 | 4.55 ± 0.09 | 0.41 | 0.69 | ||||||
| Absconding | 1 queen and 44 workers | HL | 2.00 | 1.94 ± 0.05 | 1.10 | 0.28 | ||||
| HW | 2.37 | 2.40 ± 0.05 | -0.67 | 0.51 | ||||||
| IDm | 1.06 | 1.02 ± 0.05 | 0.87 | 0.39 | ||||||
| PW | 1.25 | 1.24 ± 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.96 | ||||||
| MTL* | 0.56 | 0.47 ± 0.04 | 2.19 | 0.04 | ||||||
| AL | 3.06 | 3.06 ± 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.99 | ||||||
| T2H | 2.00 | 1.95 ± 0.10 | 0.49 | 0.63 | ||||||
| T1L | 2.18 | 2.15 ± 0.07 | 0.39 | 0.70 | ||||||
| T2BW | 0.50 | 0.49 ± 0.03 | 0.13 | 0.90 | ||||||
| WL | 4.25 | 4.31 ± 0.11 | -0.57 | 0.57 | ||||||
| Swarm | 7 queens and 11 workers | HL | 1.94 ± 0.04 | 1.92 ± 0.06 | 1.03 | 0.32 | ||||
| HW | 2.37 ± 0.05 | 2.34 ± 0.08 | 0.87 | 0.40 | ||||||
| IDm* | 1.01 ± 0.03 | 0.97 ± 0.03 | 2.69 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 9.03 | 0.01 | ||
| PW | 1.19 ± 0.04 | 1.18 ± 0.07 | 0.29 | 0.78 | ||||||
| MTL | 0.50 ± 0.00 | 0.48 ± 0.03 | 1.18 | 0.26 | ||||||
| AL | 3.00 ± 0.03 | 2.96 ± 0.03 | 0.50 | 0.63 | ||||||
| T2H* | 1.94 ± 0.07 | 1.82 ± 0.08 | 3.28 | 0.005 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 9.71 | 0.01 | ||
| T1L | 2.15 ± 0.03 | 2.14 ± 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.91 | ||||||
| T2BW | 0.48 ± 0.03 | 0.47 ± 0.03 | 0.69 | 0.50 | ||||||
| WL* | 4.41 ± 0.07 | 4.26 ± 0.14 | 2.62 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 10.61 | 0.01 | ||
* Statistically significant
Discriminant morphometric variables between queens and workers in Metapolybia docilis based on discriminant function analyses using the stepwise procedure and classification results for group comparisons through discriminant analysis. Original data are based on mm.
| Colony Phase | p | Observed classification | Predicted classification | Percent correct | |||||
| Pre-emergence | T2H* | 1 | 0.80 | 10.17 | <0.001 | Worker | 61 | 3 | 95.31 |
| HW* | 2 | 0.75 | 5.70 | 0.02 | Queen | 3 | 6 | 66.67 | |
| PL | 3 | 0.70 | 3.50 | 0.07 | Total | 64 | 9 | 91.7 | |
| T2BW | 4 | 0.69 | 3.53 | 0.06 | |||||
| T1L | 5 | 0.66 | 2.88 | 0.09 | |||||
| MTL | 6 | 0.67 | 2.70 | 0.10 | |||||
| IDm | 0.66 | 2.98 | 0.09 | ||||||
| HL | 0.64 | 1.20 | 0.28 | ||||||
| HL | 0.64 | 1.20 | 0.28 | ||||||
| AL | 0.64 | 1.16 | 0.29 | ||||||
| Worker-production | T2H* | 1 | 0.80 | 57.00 | <0.001 | Worker | Queen | ||
| HW* | 2 | 0.75 | 6.25 | 0.02 | Worker | 29 | 1 | 96.7 | |
| HL | 3 | 0.70 | 3.61 | 0.06 | Queen | 3 | 20 | 86.96 | |
| MTL | 4 | 0.69 | 3.03 | 0.09 | Total | 32 | 21 | 92.45 | |
| IDX | 5 | 0.66 | 1.71 | 0.20 | |||||
| T1L | 6 | 0.67 | 2.40 | 0.13 | |||||
| Male-production | |||||||||
| PW* | 1 | 0.75 | 32.34 | <0.001 | Worker | 30 | 0 | 100 | |
| T1L* | 2 | 0.29 | 9.00 | 0.01 | Queen | 0 | 4 | 100 | |
| HL | 3 | 0.30 | 2.76 | 0.11 | Total | 30 | 4 | 100 | |
| T2BW | 4 | 0.32 | 2.74 | 0.11 | |||||
| AL | 0.29 | 1.52 | 0.23 | ||||||
| IDM | 0.30 | 1.95 | 0.17 | ||||||
| HW | 0.29 | 1.24 | 0.28 | ||||||
| T2H* | 1 | 0.25 | 10.75 | <0.001 | Worker | 11 | 0 | 100 | |
| Swarm | WL | 2 | 0.37 | 3.66 | 0.08 | Queen | 0 | 7 | 100 |
| T1L* | 3 | 0.18 | 8.43 | 0.01 | Total | 11 | 7 | 100 | |
| PL | 4 | 0.23 | 2.17 | 0.16 | |||||
| HL | 5 | 0.24 | 3.92 | 0.07 | |||||
| HW* | 6 | 0.19 | 5.40 | 0.04 | |||||
| IDm | 7 | 0.13 | 1.01 | 0.34 | |||||
Figure 2Plots (in mm) of alitrunk length (AL) versus basal height tergum II (T2H) in five colonies of Metapolybia docilis. Queens = black squares; Workers = white circles. Each ellipse encompasses 95% of the variation found in each group. A – discrimination between all queens and workers of Metapolybia docilis using the log-log plots.