Literature DB >> 12743660

CT versus MR in neonatal brain imaging at term.

Richard L Robertson1, Caroline D Robson, David Zurakowski, Sharon Antiles, Keith Strauss, Robert V Mulkern.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent reports have highlighted the lifetime risk of malignancy from using ionizing radiation in pediatric imaging. Computed tomography (CT), which uses ionizing radiation, is employed extensively for neonatal brain imaging of term infants. Magnetic resonance (MR) provides an alternative that does not use ionizing radiation.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the cross-modality agreement and interobserver agreement of CT and MR brain imaging of the term or near-term neonate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Brain CT and MR images of 48 neonates were retrospectively reviewed by two pediatric neuroradiologists. CT and MR examinations had been obtained within 72 h of one another in all patients. CT was obtained with 5 mm collimation (KV=120, mAs=340). MR consisted of T1-weighted imaging (TR/TE=300/14; 4-mm slice thickness/1-mm gap), T2-weighted imaging (TR/TE/etl= 3000/126/16; 4-mm slice thickness/1-mm gap), and line scan diffusion imaging (LSDI) (TR/TE/b factor=1258/63/750; nominal 4-mm slice thickness/3-mm gap). The brain was categorized as normal or abnormal on both CT and MR.
RESULTS: Ischemic injury was the most common brain abnormality demonstrated. McNemar's test indicated no significant difference between CT and MR test results for reader 1 (P=0.22) or reader 2 (P=0.45). The readers agreed on the presence or absence of abnormality on CT in 40 patients (83.3%) and on MR in 45 patients (93.8%). For CT, the kappa coefficient indicated excellent interobserver agreement (kappa=0.68), although the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval extends to kappa=0.55, which indicates only good-to-moderate agreement. For MR, the kappa coefficient indicated almost perfect interobserver agreement (kappa=0.88) with the 95% confidence interval extending to a lower limit of kappa=0.76, which represents excellent agreement. CONCLUSION. Because MR demonstrates findings similar to CT and has greater interobserver agreement, it appears that MR is a superior test to CT in determining brain abnormalities in the term neonate. Furthermore, since MR eliminates the use of ionizing radiation, a putative cause of malignancy, it should be the standard in neonatal brain imaging. Future efforts should be directed to improving neonatal access to MR to avoid the routine use of CT in infants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12743660     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-003-0933-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  21 in total

1.  MR line-scan diffusion-weighted imaging of term neonates with perinatal brain ischemia.

Authors:  R L Robertson; L Ben-Sira; P D Barnes; R V Mulkern; C D Robson; S E Maier; M J Rivkin; A du Plessis
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Sensitivity profiles from an array of coils for encoding and reconstruction in parallel (SPACE RIP).

Authors:  W E Kyriakos; L P Panych; D F Kacher; C F Westin; S M Bao; R V Mulkern; F A Jolesz
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative.

Authors:  David J Brenner
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2002-03-07

4.  Current adult and pediatric CT doses.

Authors:  Edward Nickoloff
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2002-03-07

Review 5.  Imaging of the neonatal central nervous system.

Authors:  P D Barnes; G A Taylor
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.509

6.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT.

Authors:  D Brenner; C Elliston; E Hall; W Berdon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in the term newborn. Neuropathology, clinical aspects, and neuroimaging.

Authors:  M J Rivkin
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.430

8.  Injuries associated with MR imaging: survey of safety records and methods used to screen patients for metallic foreign bodies before imaging.

Authors:  R D Boutin; J E Briggs; M R Williamson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy: early magnetic resonance imaging findings and their evolution.

Authors:  M A Rutherford; J M Pennock; J E Schwieso; F M Cowan; L M Dubowitz
Journal:  Neuropediatrics       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.947

Review 10.  Practice parameter: neuroimaging of the neonate: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society.

Authors:  L R Ment; H S Bada; P Barnes; P E Grant; D Hirtz; L A Papile; J Pinto-Martin; M Rivkin; T L Slovis
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2002-06-25       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  6 in total

1.  Variable interpretation of ultrasonograms may contribute to variation in the reported incidence of white matter damage between newborn intensive care units in New Zealand.

Authors:  D L Harris; F H Bloomfield; R L Teele; J E Harding
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Sonographic templates of newborn perforator stroke.

Authors:  Lyanne Abels; Maarten Lequin; Paul Govaert
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-04-28

3.  Structural growth trajectories and rates of change in the first 3 months of infant brain development.

Authors:  Dominic Holland; Linda Chang; Thomas M Ernst; Megan Curran; Steven D Buchthal; Daniel Alicata; Jon Skranes; Heather Johansen; Antonette Hernandez; Robyn Yamakawa; Joshua M Kuperman; Anders M Dale
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 18.302

4.  αII-spectrin breakdown products (SBDPs): diagnosis and outcome in severe traumatic brain injury patients.

Authors:  Stefania Mondello; Steven A Robicsek; Andrea Gabrielli; Gretchen M Brophy; Linda Papa; Joseph Tepas; Claudia Robertson; Andras Buki; Dancia Scharf; Mo Jixiang; Linnet Akinyi; Uwe Muller; Kevin K W Wang; Ronald L Hayes
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 5.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of the brain in infants and children.

Authors:  Richard L Robertson; Charles M Glasier
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2007-06-23

6.  Brain Lesions among Orally Fed and Gastrostomy-Fed Dysphagic Preterm Infants: Can Routine Qualitative or Volumetric Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predict Feeding Outcomes?

Authors:  Nasser H Kashou; Irfaan A Dar; Mohamed A El-Mahdy; Charles Pluto; Mark Smith; Ish K Gulati; Warren Lo; Sudarshan R Jadcherla
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.418

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.