Literature DB >> 12743377

Mate choice theory and the mode of selection in sexual populations.

Hampton L Carson1.   

Abstract

Indirect new data imply that mate and/or gamete choice are major selective forces driving genetic change in sexual populations. The system dictates nonrandom mating, an evolutionary process requiring both revised genetic theory and new data on heritability of characters underlying Darwinian fitness. Successfully reproducing individuals represent rare selections from among vigorous, competing survivors of preadult natural selection. Nonrandom mating has correlated demographic effects: reduced effective population size, inbreeding, low gene flow, and emphasis on deme structure. Characters involved in choice behavior at reproduction appear based on quantitative trait loci. This variability serves selection for fitness within the population, having only an incidental relationship to the origin of genetically based reproductive isolation between populations. The claim that extensive hybridization experiments with Drosophila indicate that selection favors a gradual progression of "isolating mechanisms" is flawed, because intra-group random mating is assumed. Over deep time, local sexual populations are strong, independent genetic systems that use rich fields of variable polygenic components of fitness. The sexual reproduction system thus particularizes, in small subspecific populations, the genetic basis of the grand adaptive sweep of selective evolutionary change, much as Darwin proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12743377      PMCID: PMC164490          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0732174100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  15 in total

1.  Theory and speciation.

Authors:  M Turelli; N H. Barton; J A. Coyne
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  A review of some fundamental concepts and problems of population genetics.

Authors:  T DOBZHANSKY
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1955

3.  The Effect of an Experimental Bottleneck upon Quantitative Genetic Variation in the Housefly.

Authors:  E H Bryant; S A McCommas; L M Combs
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Tactics in reproduction: sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems.

Authors:  L K Johnson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-08-16       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The manifold effect of selection.

Authors:  K MATHER; B J HARRISON
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1949-04       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  On the evolution of premating isolation after a founder event.

Authors:  S Gavrilets; C R Boake
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Differentiation of populations.

Authors:  P R Ehrlich; P H Raven
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-09-19       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Inheritance of a secondary sexual character in Drosophila silvestris.

Authors:  H L Carson; R Lande
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  High divergence of reproductive tract proteins and their association with postzygotic reproductive isolation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis group species.

Authors:  A Civetta; R S Singh
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Gene expression during the life cycle of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Michelle N Arbeitman; Eileen E M Furlong; Farhad Imam; Eric Johnson; Brian H Null; Bruce S Baker; Mark A Krasnow; Matthew P Scott; Ronald W Davis; Kevin P White
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  13 in total

1.  A genomic comparison of faster-sex, faster-X, and faster-male evolution between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Heidi Musters; Melanie A Huntley; Rama S Singh
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Sexual selection drives speciation in an Amazonian frog.

Authors:  Kathryn E Boul; W Chris Funk; Catherine R Darst; David C Cannatella; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Transgenerational epigenetic imprints on mate preference.

Authors:  David Crews; Andrea C Gore; Timothy S Hsu; Nygerma L Dangleben; Michael Spinetta; Timothy Schallert; Matthew D Anway; Michael K Skinner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Founder effects initiated rapid species radiation in Hawaiian cave planthoppers.

Authors:  Andreas Wessel; Hannelore Hoch; Manfred Asche; Thomas von Rintelen; Björn Stelbrink; Volker Heck; Fred D Stone; Francis G Howarth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Application of a novel social choice paradigm to assess effects of prenatal endocrine-disrupting chemical exposure in rats (Rattus norvegicus).

Authors:  Michael P Reilly; Connor D Weeks; David Crews; Andrea C Gore
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 6.  Nature, nurture and epigenetics.

Authors:  David Crews; Ross Gillette; Isaac Miller-Crews; Andrea C Gore; Michael K Skinner
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 4.102

Review 7.  Mate choice, sexual selection, and endocrine-disrupting chemicals.

Authors:  Andrea C Gore; Amanda M Holley; David Crews
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.587

8.  Epigenetic synthesis: a need for a new paradigm for evolution in a contaminated world.

Authors:  David Crews; Andrea C Gore
Journal:  F1000 Biol Rep       Date:  2012-09-05

9.  Breeding Strategies to Optimize Effective Population Size in Low Census Captive Populations: The Case of Gazella cuvieri.

Authors:  Candela Ojeda-Marín; Isabel Cervantes; Eulalia Moreno; Félix Goyache; Juan Pablo Gutiérrez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Selection at the Y chromosome of the African buffalo driven by rainfall.

Authors:  Pim van Hooft; Barend J Greyling; Herbert H T Prins; Wayne M Getz; Anna E Jolles; Armanda D S Bastos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.