Literature DB >> 12742951

Improved outcome after extended gastric myotomy for achalasia.

Brant K Oelschlager1, Lily Chang, Carlos A Pellegrini.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: There is general agreement that a Heller myotomy should extend 6 to 7 cm above the gastroesophageal junction. Results of most previous studies have recommended that the myotomy extend 1 to 1.5 cm below the gastroesophageal junction. We speculated that the effectiveness of the operation could be improved if a longer, 3-cm myotomy was carried out below the gastroesophageal junction, as it would more completely obliterate the lower esophageal sphincter. We, therefore, changed our technique in 1998. Concurrently, we converted from a Dor fundoplication to a Toupet fundoplication. This study analyzes the results of our new strategy.
DESIGN: A case series using a prospectively maintained database.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: One hundred ten consecutive patients with achalasia undergoing laparoscopic Heller myotomy. INTERVENTION: We analyzed the course of 52 patients treated with a standard laparoscopic esophagogastric myotomy (1.5 cm in the stomach) and a Dor fundoplication between September 1, 1994, and August 31, 1998, and 58 treated with an extended gastric myotomy (3 cm below the gastroesophageal junction) and a Toupet fundoplication between September 1, 1998, and August 31, 2001. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Esophageal function testing (esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring), symptom questionnaire (frequency and severity), and postoperative interventions required.
RESULTS: Postoperatively the lower esophageal sphincter pressure was significantly lower after extended gastric myotomy and a Toupet fundoplication vs standard myotomy and a Dor fundoplication (9.5 vs 15.8 mm Hg). Dysphagia was both less frequent (1.2 vs 2.1) and less severe (visual analog scale, 3.2 vs 5.3) after extended gastric myotomy and Toupet fundoplication. In the standard laparoscopic esophagogastric myotomy and a Dor fundoplication group, 9 patients (17%) had recurrent, severe dysphagia, which was treated by dilation in 5 patients and by reoperation in 4 patients. In the extended gastric myotomy and Toupet fundoplication group, 2 patients (3%) developed recurrent dysphagia that resolved with dilatation. There were no reoperations in the extended gastric myotomy and Toupet fundoplication group. No difference was noted in the frequency of heartburn (1.3 vs 1.7), regurgitation (0.3 vs 0.8), and chest pain (0.3 vs 0.6), nor was there a difference between the 2 groups in proximal (1.7% vs 2.3%) and distal (6.0% vs 5.9%) esophageal acid exposure.
CONCLUSION: An extended gastric myotomy (3 cm) more effectively disrupts the lower esophageal sphincter, thus improving the results of surgical therapy for achalasia for dysphagia without increasing the rate of abnormal gastroesophageal reflux provided that a Toupet fundoplication is added.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12742951     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.138.5.490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  99 in total

1.  Laparoscopic myotomy for achalasia: predictors of successful outcome after 200 cases.

Authors:  Alfonso Torquati; William O Richards; Michael D Holzman; Kenneth W Sharp
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  How i do it: per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

Authors:  Jeffrey L Ponsky; Jeffrey M Marks; Eric M Pauli
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Surgical options for treatment of esophageal motility disorders.

Authors:  Brant K Oelschlager
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2007-09

Review 4.  Epiphrenic diverticulum of the esophagus. From pathophysiology to treatment.

Authors:  Renato Soares; Fernando A Herbella; Vivek N Prachand; Mark K Ferguson; Marco G Patti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Revisional surgery after failed esophagogastric myotomy for achalasia: successful esophageal preservation.

Authors:  Benjamin R Veenstra; Ross F Goldberg; Steven P Bowers; Mathew Thomas; Ronald A Hinder; C Daniel Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Current status in the treatment options for esophageal achalasia.

Authors:  Seng-Kee Chuah; Chien-Hua Chiu; Wei-Chen Tai; Jyong-Hong Lee; Hung-I Lu; Chi-Sin Changchien; Ping-Huei Tseng; Keng-Liang Wu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Long-term results of conventional myotomy in patients with achalasia: a prospective 20-year analysis.

Authors:  Ines Gockel; Theodor Junginger; Volker F Eckardt
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  The outcome of laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia is not influenced by the degree of esophageal dilatation.

Authors:  Matthew P Sweet; Ian Nipomnick; Warren J Gasper; Karen Bagatelos; James W Ostroff; Piero M Fisichella; Lawrence W Way; Marco G Patti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Tailoring Therapy for Achalasia.

Authors:  Joel E Richter
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2020-05

Review 10.  Per-oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: An American perspective.

Authors:  David Friedel; Rani Modayil; Shahzad Iqbal; James H Grendell; Stavros N Stavropoulos
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-09-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.