BACKGROUND: The use of immunization assessment and referral (A/R) in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) has been shown to produce dramatic improvements in vaccination coverage when coupled with parental incentive; however, data are lacking to support the use of A/R alone. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of A/R in increasing immunization coverage among WIC participants. DESIGN:Participating WIC centers were assigned to1 of 3 interventions that delivered A/R of varying frequency or a control group. SETTING: Twenty of the largest Public Health Foundation Enterprises-WIC centers in Los Angeles County. PARTICIPANTS: Children continuously enrolled in participating WIC centers from 6 to 24 months of age. INTERVENTION: Assessment of child's vaccination status followed by referral to a health care provider for those lacking indicated vaccinations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Up-to-date (UTD) status at 24 months of age for all recommended vaccines. RESULTS:Baseline coverage rates were similar among all study sites (overall, 77% UTD). After the study period, compared with the controls (88% UTD), we found no differences in immunization coverage among WIC centers that administered A/R at every visit (every 2 months) to all children (90% UTD; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-1.94), every 6 months to all children (89% UTD; OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.62-1.56), or every visit to children found to be behind at 8 months of age (89% UTD; OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.48-1.68). CONCLUSION: In this urban population of WIC children with high baseline immunization coverage, A/R was not effective in increasing immunization coverage.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The use of immunization assessment and referral (A/R) in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) has been shown to produce dramatic improvements in vaccination coverage when coupled with parental incentive; however, data are lacking to support the use of A/R alone. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of A/R in increasing immunization coverage among WIC participants. DESIGN: Participating WIC centers were assigned to1 of 3 interventions that delivered A/R of varying frequency or a control group. SETTING: Twenty of the largest Public Health Foundation Enterprises-WIC centers in Los Angeles County. PARTICIPANTS: Children continuously enrolled in participating WIC centers from 6 to 24 months of age. INTERVENTION: Assessment of child's vaccination status followed by referral to a health care provider for those lacking indicated vaccinations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Up-to-date (UTD) status at 24 months of age for all recommended vaccines. RESULTS: Baseline coverage rates were similar among all study sites (overall, 77% UTD). After the study period, compared with the controls (88% UTD), we found no differences in immunization coverage among WIC centers that administered A/R at every visit (every 2 months) to all children (90% UTD; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-1.94), every 6 months to all children (89% UTD; OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.62-1.56), or every visit to children found to be behind at 8 months of age (89% UTD; OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.48-1.68). CONCLUSION: In this urban population of WIC children with high baseline immunization coverage, A/R was not effective in increasing immunization coverage.
Authors: Tista S Ghosh; Jennifer L Patnaik; Anne Bennett; Lynn Trefren; Richard L Vogt Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2007 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Thomas George; Abigail M Shefer; Donna Rickert; Felicita David; John M Stevenson; Daniel B Fishbein Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2007-03-15
Authors: Olusola Oladeji; Penelope Campbell; Chandrakala Jaiswal; Dick Chamla; Bibilola Oladeji; Christopher Otti Ajumara; Lydie Maoungou Minguiel; Joseph Senesie Journal: Pan Afr Med J Date: 2019-01-16