Literature DB >> 12742877

Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive Services: the GAPS in practice.

Anne Gadomski1, Shannon Bennett, Margaret Young, Lawrence S Wissow.   

Abstract

DESIGN: Pre- and post-Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive Services (GAPS) comparison of outcomes gathered via chart audit.
SETTING: A rural hospital-based general pediatric clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Adolescents who underwent annual examinations between April 1, 1998, and March 31, 2001. A random sample of 441 medical records was reviewed. INTERVENTION: Training in the GAPS model and use of the questionnaire began in April 1998. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Detection of, discussion of, and referrals for GAPS-related risk behavior.
RESULTS: The medical records of 162 younger adolescents (aged 11-15 years) and 279 older adolescents (aged 16-19 years) were audited. Detection of risk behaviors increased from 19% at baseline to 95% with the initial GAPS and 87% with the periodic GAPS. The most prevalent risk factor was having a rifle or gun in the home (younger adolescents, 47% and older adolescents, 39%). The mean number of risk behaviors and health concerns documented was higher in the initial GAPS (4.8 and 1.3, respectively) than in the periodic GAPS (3.8 and 0.7) (P =.01 and.006). The GAPS questionnaires detected lower levels of risk behavior compared with a local Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Controlling for sex, age, and clinician, discussion of psychosocial topics increased during the study period; however, there was considerable variation among clinicians regarding the topics addressed. The GAPS-related referral rate did not change significantly.
CONCLUSION: The GAPS model increases clinicians' detection and discussion of risk behaviors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12742877     DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.157.5.426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med        ISSN: 1072-4710


  7 in total

1.  Development and clinical use of Rapid Assessment for Adolescent Preventive Services (RAAPS) questionnaire in school-based health centers.

Authors:  Chin Hwa Yi; Kristy Martyn; Jennifer Salerno; Cynthia S Darling-Fisher
Journal:  J Pediatr Health Care       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 1.812

2.  Assessing the impact of a web-based comprehensive somatic and mental health screening tool in pediatric primary care.

Authors:  Kate E Fothergill; Anne Gadomski; Barry S Solomon; Ardis L Olson; Cecelia A Gaffney; Susan Dosreis; Lawrence S Wissow
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.107

3.  Exploration of health status, healthcare utilization, and health service expectations among Taiwanese adolescents.

Authors:  Meng-Che Tsai; Sheng-Hsiang Lin; Yen-Yin Chou; Shio-Jean Lin
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Provider, patient, and family perspectives of adolescent alcohol use and treatment in rural settings.

Authors:  Adam J Gordon; Lorraine Ettaro; Keri L Rodriguez; John Mocik; Duncan B Clark
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Do the Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive Services (GAPS) facilitate mental health diagnosis?

Authors:  Anne M Gadomski; Melissa B Scribani; Nicole Krupa; Paul L Jenkins
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2014-01-31

6.  Detecting and addressing adolescent issues and concerns: evaluating the efficacy of a primary care previsit questionnaire.

Authors:  Warren Lewin; Bärbel Knäuper; Michelle Roseman; Perry Adler; Michael Malus
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 7.  Psychosocial assessments for young people: a systematic review examining acceptability, disclosure and engagement, and predictive utility.

Authors:  Sally Bradford; Debra Rickwood
Journal:  Adolesc Health Med Ther       Date:  2012-12-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.