Literature DB >> 12742770

Cancer survivorship and agency model: implications for patient choice, decision making, and influence.

Dan O'Hair1, Melinda M Villagran, Elaine Wittenberg, Kenneth Brown, Monica Ferguson, Harry T Hall, Timothy Doty.   

Abstract

Relative to other types of health communication research (acute care physician patient communication, communication campaigns, compliance episodes, etc.), investigations of patient communication following the diagnosis of cancer are infrequent. Theoretically driven, empirical research is desperately needed in such postdiagnostic communication processes as survivorship, quality of life, palliative and hospice care, and loss, bereavement, and grief for those millions of people who have been diagnosed with the second leading cause of death in our nation. An organizational model of patient communication is needed that identifies and describes salient issues and processes involved when cancer patients attempt to negotiate the difficult courses of action following the diagnosis of cancer. The cancer survivorship and agency model (CSAM) proposes both general and specific strategies that serve as options for patients seeking to take greater control of the decision-making process related to their treatment and care of cancer. Although seemingly practical in its offering, CSAM is intended to serve as a heuristic springboard for theoretically based, applied communication research focusing exclusively on post diagnostic cancer processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12742770     DOI: 10.1207/S15327027HC1502_7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Commun        ISSN: 1041-0236


  6 in total

1.  Exploring the role of physician communication about adjuvant endocrine therapy among breast cancer patients on active treatment: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Albert J Farias; India J Ornelas; Sarah D Hohl; Steven B Zeliadt; Ryan N Hansen; Christopher I Li; Beti Thompson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Self-advocacy and cancer: a concept analysis.

Authors:  Teresa L Hagan; Heidi S Donovan
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.187

3.  Peer support opportunities across the cancer care continuum: a systematic scoping review of recent peer-reviewed literature.

Authors:  Sarah D Kowitt; Katrina R Ellis; Veronica Carlisle; Nivedita L Bhushan; Kristin Z Black; Kaitlyn Brodar; Nicole M Cranley; Kia L Davis; Eugenia Eng; Michelle Y Martin; Jared McGuirt; Rebeccah L Sokol; Patrick Y Tang; Anissa I Vines; Jennifer S Walker; Edwin B Fisher
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  How technology impacts communication between cancer patients and their health care providers: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Safa ElKefi; Onur Asan
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 4.046

5.  Patient participation in decision-making about cardiovascular preventive drugs - resistance as agency.

Authors:  Josabeth Hultberg; Carl Edvard Rudebeck
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.581

6.  Older Adults' Attitudes towards Cognitive Testing: Moving towards Person-Centeredness.

Authors:  Sara Wong; Claudia Jacova
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra       Date:  2018-10-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.