Literature DB >> 12742752

Basal euteleostean relationships: a mitogenomic perspective on the phylogenetic reality of the "Protacanthopterygii".

Naoya B Ishiguro1, Masaki Miya, Mutsumi Nishida.   

Abstract

Higher-level relationships of the basal Euteleostei (=Protacanthopterygii) are so complex and controversial that at least nine different morphology-based phylogenetic hypotheses have been proposed during the last 30 years. Relationships of the Protacanthopterygii were investigated using mitochondrial genomic (mitogenomic) data from 34 purposefully chosen species (data for 12 species being newly determined during the study) that fully represented major basal euteleostean lineages and some basal teleosts plus neoteleosts as outgroups. Unweighted and weighted maximum parsimony (MP) and maximum likelihood (ML) analyses were conducted with the data set that comprised concatenated nucleotide sequences from 12 protein-coding genes (excluding the ND6 gene and 3rd codon positions) and 22 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes (stem regions only) from the 34 species. The resultant trees were well resolved and largely congruent, with most internal branches being supported by high statistical values. Monophyly of the protacanthopterygians was confidently rejected by the mitogenomic data. Of the five major monophyletic groups that received high statistical support within the protacanthopterygians, a clade comprising members of the alepocephaloids was unexpectedly nested within the Otocephala, sister-group of the euteleosts. The remaining four major monophyletic groups, on the other hand, occupied phylogenetic positions intermediate between the otocephalans and neoteleosts, with a clade comprising esociforms + salmoniforms being more basal to the argentinoids and osmeroids. Although interrelationships of the latter two clades (argentinoids and osmeroids) with the neoteleosts remained ambiguous, the present results indicated explicitly that the protacanthopterygians as currently defined merely represent a collective, polyphyletic group of the basal euteleosts, located between the basal teleosts (elopomorphs and below) and neoteleosts (stomiiforms and above).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12742752     DOI: 10.1016/s1055-7903(02)00418-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  40 in total

1.  Novel relationships among ten fish model species revealed based on a phylogenomic analysis using ESTs.

Authors:  Dirk Steinke; Walter Salzburger; Axel Meyer
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  PCR-based approach for sequencing mitochondrial genomes of decapod crustaceans, with a practical example from kuruma prawn (Marsupenaeus japonicus).

Authors:  Mitsugu M Yamauchi; Masaki U Miya; Ryuji J Machida; Mutsumi Nishida
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Mitogenomic evolution and interrelationships of the Cypriniformes (Actinopterygii: Ostariophysi): the first evidence toward resolution of higher-level relationships of the world's largest freshwater fish clade based on 59 whole mitogenome sequences.

Authors:  K Saitoh; T Sado; R L Mayden; N Hanzawa; K Nakamura; M Nishida; M Miya
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Evolution of Hox clusters in Salmonidae: a comparative analysis between Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).

Authors:  Hooman K Moghadam; Moira M Ferguson; Roy G Danzmann
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Evolution of muscle activity patterns driving motions of the jaw and hyoid during chewing in Gnathostomes.

Authors:  Nicolai Konow; Anthony Herrel; Callum F Ross; Susan H Williams; Rebecca Z German; Christopher P J Sanford; Chris Gintof
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 3.326

6.  The duplication of the Hox gene clusters in teleost fishes.

Authors:  Sonja J Prohaska; Peter F Stadler
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.919

7.  Salmo salar and Esox lucius full-length cDNA sequences reveal changes in evolutionary pressures on a post-tetraploidization genome.

Authors:  Jong S Leong; Stuart G Jantzen; Kristian R von Schalburg; Glenn A Cooper; Amber M Messmer; Nancy Y Liao; Sarah Munro; Richard Moore; Robert A Holt; Steven J M Jones; William S Davidson; Ben F Koop
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Intron-loss evolution of hatching enzyme genes in Teleostei.

Authors:  Mari Kawaguchi; Junya Hiroi; Masaki Miya; Mutsumi Nishida; Ichiro Iuchi; Shigeki Yasumasu
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Deep-ocean origin of the freshwater eels.

Authors:  Jun G Inoue; Masaki Miya; Michael J Miller; Tetsuya Sado; Reinhold Hanel; Kiyotaka Hatooka; Jun Aoyama; Yuki Minegishi; Mutsumi Nishida; Katsumi Tsukamoto
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  The fate of the duplicated androgen receptor in fishes: a late neofunctionalization event?

Authors:  Véronique Douard; Frédéric Brunet; Bastien Boussau; Isabelle Ahrens-Fath; Virginie Vlaeminck-Guillem; Bernard Haendler; Vincent Laudet; Yann Guiguen
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.