Literature DB >> 12742611

Variation in physicians' definitions of the competent parent and other barriers to guideline adherence: the case of pediatric minor head injury management.

Elisa J Sobo1, Paul Kurtin.   

Abstract

A lack of consensus regarding the definition of even an everyday term can affect physician adherence to clinical guidelines using that term. We demonstrate this by taking, as an illustrative case, the American Academy of Pediatrics' minor head injury (MHI) management guidelines, which generally recommend at-home observation by a "competent" parent (or the equivalent). The recommendation assumes consensus among physicians as to what parental competence comprises. We systematically examined this assumption. Physicians associated with Children's Hospital, San Diego were mailed a survey asking them to freely list terms defining parental competence. Independent variables were: physician gender, training, specialty, practice location, patient age mix, years in practice, and number of MHI cases seen per year. Dependent variables were: free-list content and length, ease and style of competence decision-making style (e.g., independent or collaborative), familiarity with the guidelines, and likelihood of ordering a computed tomography (CT) scan. Of 112 respondents, 34 (30%) were "not at all" or only "slightly" familiar with the guidelines; 23% (21/112) "frequently" or "sometimes" ordered CTs when the guidelines did not support this. Surgeons were more likely to order discretionary CTs. Office-based, pediatric-trained, and female physicians each found it significantly easier than their counterparts to determine which parents were, in their opinion, competent. Men reported using "objective" criteria significantly less frequently than women. A total of 64 discrete criteria were listed. Individual lists contained an average of 6.5 items. Surgeon's lists were significantly shorter than those of medical physicians. Seven sub-domains of competence were identified. Parental competence is not a unitary construct interpreted similarly by all physicians. Subgroups with distinct models may exist; training and specialization may be key variables. To decrease MHI management variation, guidelines should specify parental competence factors to be considered; they may need to be tailored to different physician subgroups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12742611     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00283-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  6 in total

1.  Parent-identified barriers to pediatric health care: a process-oriented model.

Authors:  Elisa J Sobo; Michael Seid; Leticia Reyes Gelhard
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Using freelisting to understand shared decision making in ADHD: parents' and pediatricians' perspectives.

Authors:  Alexander G Fiks; Angela Gafen; Cayce C Hughes; Kenya F Hunter; Frances K Barg
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-08-24

3.  Parental Perception of a Dental Home for Children with Special Needs.

Authors:  Mohamed A Hendaus; Deena Shaltout; Dure Yasrab; Aya Al-Noubani; Sara G Hamad; Mohammed Alamri; Ahmed H Alhammadi
Journal:  Pediatric Health Med Ther       Date:  2020-09-21

4.  Parental perception of oral health status of children in mainstream and special education classrooms.

Authors:  Yogita Butani; Stuart A Gansky; Jane A Weintraub
Journal:  Spec Care Dentist       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug

5.  Parents attitudes toward the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine: A new concept in the State of Qatar.

Authors:  Mohamed A Hendaus; Manasik Hassan; Moza Alsulaiti; Tasabeh Mohamed; Reem Mohamed; Dure Yasrab; Hadeel Mahjoob; Ahmed H Alhammadi
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-07-30

6.  Important End-of-Life Topics among Latino Patients and Caregivers Coping with Advanced Cancer.

Authors:  Lianel Rosario-Ramos; Keishliany Suarez; Cristina Peña-Vargas; Yoamy Toro-Morales; Rosario Costas-Muñiz; Eida Castro; Stephanie Torres; Normarie Torres-Blasco
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 4.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.