Preclinical results of sirolimus treatment in transplant models.

Sirolimus (SRL; rapamycin) is a macrolide antibiotic, which modest anticandidal and tumoricidal activities were superseded by its immunosuppressive potential to block allograft rejection. The most intriguing biological characteristic of SRL emerged after demonstration of its potent synergism with cyclosporine (CsA). Naïve T cells, residing in the G(0) phase of the cell cycle, become activated by three signals. Signal 1 (T cell antigen receptor/alloantigen) and Signal 2 (CD28/B7) progress T cell to the early G(1) phase inducing production of interleukin-2 (IL-2) and other T cell growth factors (TGFs). Signal 3 (cytokine/cytokine receptor) initiate cell division and differentiation in the late G(1)/S phase. Whereas CsA binding to calcineurin blocks Signal 1/2, SRL binding to mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) blocks Signal 3. Our preclinical studies have established the in vivo principles of the effects exhibited by SRL alone on allograft survival, synergism between SRL and CsA as well as two drugs pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions. In our experimental model, a 14-day i.v. continuous infusion of SRL by osmotic pump into rat recipients extended the survivals of heart allografts in a dose-dependent fashion. In comparison to untreated controls (MST of 6.3 +/- 0.5 days), 0.08 mg/kg SRL extended MST to 34.4 +/- 12.1 days, and 0.8 mg/kg to 74.1 +/- 20.2 days, with 6/18 allografts surviving for more than 100 days. Since almost identical results were produced by 10-fold higher SRL doses delivered by oral gavage, we estimated its bioavailability at 10%. Similarly, SRL prolonged the survivals of kidney, pancreas, and small bowel allografts in rats. At the same time large animal models cautioned about potential toxicities, namely intestinal vasculitis. The synergistic interactions of CsA and SRL may be explained by sequential effects in the early G(0)/G(1) versus late G1/S phases of cell cycle progression, respectively. The in vivo interaction of SRL with other immunosuppressive drugs was evaluated by the median effect analysis and the combination index (CI) values (CI = 1 shows additive, CI < 1, synergistic, and CI > 1, antagonistic, interactions). Oral SRL proved to be synergistic in both CsA-resistant mouse (CI = 0.4-1.5) and CsA-sensitive rat (CI = 0.3-0.6) models. The pharmacokinetic interactions of SRL and/or CsA were evaluated in rats for i.v. and oral formulations. Although low CsA and SRL i.v. doses did not affect each other levels, potent interaction was observed after oral gavage: CsA increased SRL levels by 2-11 folds; and, SRL increased CsA levels by 2-3-folds. Our results suggested that both pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions contribute to the synergism between SRL and CsA. We also estimated the impact of CsA/SRL interaction on renal dysfunction, myelosuppression, and hyperlipidemia. Salt-depleted rats treated with SRL (0.4-6.4 mg/kg) and/or CsA (2.5-20 mg/kg) were examined for glomerular filtration rates (GFR), lipid levels, and bone marrow cellularity. CsA-induced kidney function deficiency was exacerbated by SRL. This exacerbation of renal dysfunction correlated with increased CsA levels in kidneys when combined with SRL. Furthermore, CsA potentiated SRL-mediated toxicities, namely myelosuppression and increased cholesterol. In conclusion, SRL therapy is synergistic with CsA but both drug levels should be carefully monitored to avoid toxic effects.