Literature DB >> 12742476

Sirolimus: a single center experience in combination with calcineurin inhibitors.

R Masterson1, M Leikis, V Perkovic, K Nicholls, R Walker.   

Abstract

A retrospective survey was performed to establish patient and graft outcome for all 41 patients at our centre receiving sirolimus (SRL) in combination with calcineurin inhibition (CNI) as primary therapy for the 6 years prior to March 2002. Patient mortality [12%; n = 5 (TTP, lymphoma, mucormycosis, and small bowel perforation] was significantly higher at 3 months compared with those not receiving SRL, but not thereafter. 12.8% had delayed graft function and 33% had one or more episodes of rejection in the first 6 months. Mean GFR at 12 months was significantly lower (47.3 mL/min) in the SRL group compared with those not receiving SRL (51.3 mL/min). Twenty-two patients had a 12-month protocol biopsy; CNI toxicity was present in 36%. SRL was associated with significant hyperlipidaemia (serum cholesterol, 5.2 +/- 1.4 at baseline vs 7.3 +/- 1.7 mmol/L at 3 months, P <.001; triglycerides, 2.3 +/- 1.4 at baseline vs 2.7 +/- 1.1 mmol/L at 3 months, P <.05). Mild thrombocytopenia occurred in 23% but was not associated with haemorrhagic events. LDH increased by 62%, remaining elevated out to 2 years post engraftment. Seven patients developed insulin requiring diabetes mellitus, similar to the rate observed in our general transplant population.Thus, in this early experience, SRL in combination with CNI was associated with significant mortality and morbidity including CNI toxicity, presumably a reflection of a heavy burden of immunosuppression. However, 1-year graft survival on SRL was similar to the mean Australia-wide graft survival regardless of immunosuppression. The future use of SRL may center around CNI sparing and avoidance type protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12742476     DOI: 10.1016/s0041-1345(03)00219-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  5 in total

1.  The efficacy of sirolimus in the treatment of patients with refractory uveitis.

Authors:  V A Shanmuganathan; E M Casely; D Raj; R J Powell; A Joseph; W M Amoaku; H S Dua
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  Use of sirolimus in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Joshua J Augustine; Kenneth A Bodziak; Donald E Hricik
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Benefit-risk assessment of sirolimus in renal transplantation.

Authors:  Dirk R J Kuypers
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Comparable Renal Function at 6 Months with Tacrolimus Combined with Fixed-Dose Sirolimus or MMF: Results of a Randomized Multicenter Trial in Renal Transplantation.

Authors:  Eveline Van Gurp; Jesus Bustamante; Antonio Franco; Lionel Rostaing; Thomas Becker; Eric Rondeau; Zenon Czajkowski; Andrzej Rydzewski; Antonio Alarcon; Petr Bachleda; Jiri Samlik; Dirk Burmeister; Luis Pallardo; Marie-Christine Moal; Boleslaw Rutkowski; Zbigniew Wlodarczyk
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2010-10-05

5.  Alloimmune haemolysis in a renal transplant recipient receiving sirolimus.

Authors:  Adam J Hedley; Shaun Flint; Annabel Tuckfield; Rowan Walker; Solomon Cohney
Journal:  NDT Plus       Date:  2008-03-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.