PURPOSE: To compare various characteristics of two new-generation laboratory-processed resin composites (BelleGlass HP/SDS-Kerr and Sinfony/3M-ESPE). The properties evaluated were degree of C=C conversion, microhardness, roughness, biaxial flexural strength and polymerization shrinkage-strain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All specimens were subjected to a first and a second polymerization cycle according to the manufacturers' instructions. The degree of C=C conversion (DC) was recorded on rectangular (3 x 2 x 0.5mm(3)) specimens (n=3) by FT-IR micromultiple internal reflectance spectroscopy immediately after each of the two polymerization cycles. Twenty cylindrical specimens (10 x 2mm(2)) of each material were prepared for surface microhardness (n=10, VHN, 200 g load, 20s) and surface roughness (n=10, Ra) measurements. The biaxial flexural strength and stiffness were determined on disk-shaped (n=8, 15 x 0.7 mm(2)) specimens loaded to fracture at 1 mm/min crosshead speed. The polymerization shrinkage-strain was calculated with the bonded-disk method. All values were statistically analyzed by Student's unpaired t-test (p<0.05). RESULTS: The second polymerization cycle significantly increased the degree of C=C conversion for both materials (p<0.05). BelleGlass HP exhibited significantly higher degree of C=C conversion, surface microhardness, surface roughness, biaxial flexural strength and stiffness values compared to Sinfony (p<0.05). SIGNIFICANCE: Several differences exist between the materials although both products are recommended for the same clinical applications.
PURPOSE: To compare various characteristics of two new-generation laboratory-processed resin composites (BelleGlass HP/SDS-Kerr and Sinfony/3M-ESPE). The properties evaluated were degree of C=C conversion, microhardness, roughness, biaxial flexural strength and polymerization shrinkage-strain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All specimens were subjected to a first and a second polymerization cycle according to the manufacturers' instructions. The degree of C=C conversion (DC) was recorded on rectangular (3 x 2 x 0.5mm(3)) specimens (n=3) by FT-IR micromultiple internal reflectance spectroscopy immediately after each of the two polymerization cycles. Twenty cylindrical specimens (10 x 2mm(2)) of each material were prepared for surface microhardness (n=10, VHN, 200 g load, 20s) and surface roughness (n=10, Ra) measurements. The biaxial flexural strength and stiffness were determined on disk-shaped (n=8, 15 x 0.7 mm(2)) specimens loaded to fracture at 1 mm/min crosshead speed. The polymerization shrinkage-strain was calculated with the bonded-disk method. All values were statistically analyzed by Student's unpaired t-test (p<0.05). RESULTS: The second polymerization cycle significantly increased the degree of C=C conversion for both materials (p<0.05). BelleGlass HP exhibited significantly higher degree of C=C conversion, surface microhardness, surface roughness, biaxial flexural strength and stiffness values compared to Sinfony (p<0.05). SIGNIFICANCE: Several differences exist between the materials although both products are recommended for the same clinical applications.
Authors: Ana Paula Albuquerque Guedes; Bruna Oliveira-Reis; Anderson Catelan; ThaÍs Yumi Umeda Suzuki; André LuÍz Fraga Briso; Paulo Henrique Dos Santos Journal: Eur J Dent Date: 2018 Oct-Dec