Literature DB >> 12742414

Prognostic value of contractile response during high-dose dipyridamole echocardiography test in heart transplant recipients.

Guglielma Rita Ciliberto1, Oberdan Parodi, Gabriella Cataldo, Maurizio Mangiavacchi, Antonia Alberti, Marina Parolini, Maria Frigerio.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains a main factor limiting long-term survival after heart transplantation (HTX). The diagnosis of CAV is still based on serial coronary angiography. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of high-dose dipyridamole echocardiography in HTX.
METHODS: Sixty-eight patients underwent dipyridamole echocardiography within 48 hours of their scheduled annual coronary angiography. Coronary allograft vasculopathy was defined as CAV 1 (focal or diffuse stenosis <50%) or CAV 2 (focal or diffuse stenosis >or=50%). Wall-motion score index (WMSI) was evaluated at rest and after dipyridamole administration.
RESULTS: Results of coronary angiography were normal in 43 patients (63%), showed CAV 1 in 11 (16%), and showed CAV 2 in 14 (21%). Rest wall motion was normal in 39 patients and abnormal in 29. After dipyridamole administration, wall motion remained normal in all 39 (Group 1, no CAV in 34 and CAV 1 in 5). Of 29 patients with rest wall-motion abnormalities, all reversed to normal after dipyridamole in 8 patients (Group 2, no CAV in 7 and CAV 1 in 1) and remained or worsened in 21 (Group 3, CAV 2 in 14 and no CAV or CAV 1 in 7). During follow-up (6 +/- 3 years), 15 patients had major cardiac events: 11 occurred in Group 3, whereas 4 occurred in Groups 1 and 2. Wall motion at rest and after dipyridamole administration and CAV were independent predictors for cardiac events; only dipyridamole WMSI >1 remained significant (p < 0.0001) at multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Dipyridamole echocardiography is a simple, non-invasive test that after HTX may identify patients with altered wall motion who deserve stricter surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12742414     DOI: 10.1016/s1053-2498(02)01238-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  4 in total

Review 1.  How to Approach the Assessment of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy in the Modern Era: Review of Invasive Imaging Modalities.

Authors:  Ali Javaheri; Naveen Saha; Scott M Lilly
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2016-04

Review 2.  The role of non-invasive imaging modalities in cardiac allograft vasculopathy: an updated focus on current evidences.

Authors:  C Sciaccaluga; N Ghionzoli; G E Mandoli; N Sisti; F D'Ascenzi; M Focardi; S Bernazzali; G Vergaro; M Emdin; S Valente; M Cameli
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 3.  Usefulness and limitations of transthoracic echocardiography in heart transplantation recipients.

Authors:  Sergio Mondillo; Massimo Maccherini; Maurizio Galderisi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 2.062

Review 4.  The Role of Echocardiography in the Management of Heart Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Daniele Masarone; Michelle Kittleson; Rita Gravino; Fabio Valente; Andrea Petraio; Giuseppe Pacileo
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.