BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Waiting lists for radiotherapy have become longer over the past years. Apart from the psychological distress for the patient we are concerned about tumour growth during this waiting time, which may worsen prognosis. The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate tumour growth in the waiting time and to obtain an indication of its clinical consequences for patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma. A tumour control probability (TCP) model was applied to evaluate consequences for outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Increase in tumour volume was measured for 13 patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma by outlining the tumour on the diagnostic as well as on the treatment planning CT scan. Waiting time was defined as time between histopathological diagnosis and start of radiotherapy. For each tumour we calculated the increase in tumour volume and the tumour doubling time. The potential increase in TCP was calculated for each tumour for the situation without treatment delay. RESULTS: The mean increase in tumour volume was 70%. The mean waiting time was 56 days. Expected TCP with incorporation of delay was 47%, without delay it might have been 63-66%. CONCLUSION: This study shows tumour progression during the time between the diagnostic CT scan and the treatment planning CT scan in oropharyngeal cancer. As a consequence of waiting time, which allows tumour volume increase, there may be an average control loss of 16-19 % for these tumours during the total waiting time before radiotherapy.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Waiting lists for radiotherapy have become longer over the past years. Apart from the psychological distress for the patient we are concerned about tumour growth during this waiting time, which may worsen prognosis. The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate tumour growth in the waiting time and to obtain an indication of its clinical consequences for patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma. A tumour control probability (TCP) model was applied to evaluate consequences for outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Increase in tumour volume was measured for 13 patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma by outlining the tumour on the diagnostic as well as on the treatment planning CT scan. Waiting time was defined as time between histopathological diagnosis and start of radiotherapy. For each tumour we calculated the increase in tumour volume and the tumour doubling time. The potential increase in TCP was calculated for each tumour for the situation without treatment delay. RESULTS: The mean increase in tumour volume was 70%. The mean waiting time was 56 days. Expected TCP with incorporation of delay was 47%, without delay it might have been 63-66%. CONCLUSION: This study shows tumour progression during the time between the diagnostic CT scan and the treatment planning CT scan in oropharyngeal cancer. As a consequence of waiting time, which allows tumour volume increase, there may be an average control loss of 16-19 % for these tumours during the total waiting time before radiotherapy.
Authors: Luke H DeGraaff; Alexis J Platek; Austin J Iovoli; Kimberly E Wooten; Hassan Arshad; Vishal Gupta; Ryan P McSpadden; Moni Abraham Kuriakose; Wesley L Hicks; Mary E Platek; Anurag K Singh Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Sonam Sharma; Justin Bekelman; Alexander Lin; J Nicholas Lukens; Benjamin R Roman; Nandita Mitra; Samuel Swisher-McClure Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2016-03-16 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Cristina E Brickman; Kathleen J Propert; Jessica S Merlin; Jeffrey C Liu; Sequoya Eady; Amy Mcghee-Jez; Camille Ragin; Surbhi Grover; Roger B Cohen; Robert Gross Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2019-08-29 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Colin T Murphy; Thomas J Galloway; Elizabeth A Handorf; Brian L Egleston; Lora S Wang; Ranee Mehra; Douglas B Flieder; John A Ridge Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A Waters; M Alizadeh; C Filion; F Ashbury; J Pun; M P Chagnon; A Legrain; M A Fortin Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2016-08-12 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Sören Dahlke; Diana Steinmann; Hans Christiansen; Martin Durisin; Andre Eckardt; Gerd Wegener; Michael Bremer; Andreas Meyer Journal: In Vivo Date: 2017 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.155