Physiological cost of running while wearing spring-boots.

The purpose of the study was to investigate the physiological cost of running in spring-boots compared with running in running shoes at different speeds. During testing, subjects (n = 7) completed running trials while wearing spring-boots and running shoes. Three speed conditions (2.23, 2.68, and 3.13 m.s(-1)) were completed per shoe condition (i.e., spring-boots and running shoes). Rate of oxygen consumption (Vo(2)), heart rate (HR), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and stride frequency were recorded for each condition. Order of shoe conditions was balanced, with speeds tested continuously from slow to fast. There was no difference in Vo(2), HR, or RPE between shoe conditions across speeds (p > 0.05). Stride frequency was lower during running in spring-boots vs. running shoes at each speed (speed of spring-boots vs. running shoes for 2.23 m x s(-1): 69.9 +/- 2.9 strides x min(-1) vs. 75.6 +/- 3.5 strides x min(-1); for 2.68 m x s(-1): 71.3 +/- 5.2 strides x min(-1) vs. 79.4 +/- 5.0 strides x min(-1); for 3.13 m x s(-1): 73.6 +/- 7.3 strides x min(-1) vs. 83.1 +/- 8.2 strides x min(-1); p < 0.05). Despite the added mass to the lower extremity and change in stride frequency during running in spring-boots, the physiological cost of running was similar to that of running in running shoes. Exercising while running in spring-boots may provide less impact force with no change in running economy.