Literature DB >> 12740330

Direct measurement of acid permeation into rat oesophagus.

S Tanaka1, S Chu, M Hirokawa, M H Montrose, J D Kaunitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The early responses of the oesophageal mucosa to acid perfusion may predict subsequent pathology. Mucosal responses to luminal acid may result either from acid permeating through the mucosa or from other unknown transduction mechanisms. In order to better understand the dynamics of acid permeation into the oesophageal mucosa, we measured interstitial pH (pH(int)) of the oesophageal basal epithelial layer, pre-epithelial layer thickness, and blood flow in rats in vivo during luminal acid challenge. A novel confocal microscopic technique was used in vitro to measure pH(int) from defined cellular sites in response to luminal and basolateral acidification.
METHODS: 5-(and-6)-Carboxyfluorescein (CF) and carboxy-seminapthorhodofluor-1 (SNARF-1) fluorescence was used to measure pH(int) by conventional and confocal microscopy, respectively, in urethane anaesthetised rats. Pre-epithelial layer thickness was measured optically with carbon particles as markers. Blood flow was measured with laser Doppler flowmetry.
RESULTS: Luminal acidification failed to alter pH(int) in vivo and in vitro, but pH(int) was lowered by modest serosal acidification. Pre-epithelial layer thickness and blood flow increased significantly during luminal surface acid perfusion. Indomethacin had no effect on any acid related response.
CONCLUSION: In this first dynamic measurement of oesophageal acid permeation and pre-epithelial layer thickness, pH(int) was preserved in spite of high luminal acidity by two complementary techniques. Despite the apparent permeability barrier to acid permeation, oesophageal blood flow and thickness responded to luminal acid perfusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12740330      PMCID: PMC1773668          DOI: 10.1136/gut.52.6.775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  56 in total

1.  Barriers to paracellular permeability in rabbit esophageal epithelium.

Authors:  R C Orlando; E R Lacy; N A Tobey; K Cowart
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Experimental esophagitis in a rabbit model. Clinical relevance.

Authors:  L F Johnson; J W Harmon
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.062

3.  Serosal bicarbonate protects against acid injury to rabbit esophagus.

Authors:  N A Tobey; D W Powell; V J Schreiner; R C Orlando
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Antiinflammatory agents protect opossum esophagus during radiotherapy.

Authors:  M G Northway; G L Eastwood; H I Libshitz; M S Feldman; J J Mamel; I A Szwarc
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Mechanisms of acid injury to rabbit esophageal epithelium. Role of basolateral cell membrane acidification.

Authors:  N A Tobey; R C Orlando
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  In vivo measurement of rat gastric surface cell intracellular pH.

Authors:  K Kaneko; P H Guth; J D Kaunitz
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1991-09

7.  Capsaicin-sensitive nerves mediate esophageal mucosal protection.

Authors:  B L Bass; K S Trad; J W Harmon; F Z Hakki
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  In vivo alkaline secretion by mammalian esophagus.

Authors:  B H Hamilton; R C Orlando
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Effects of prostaglandins on esophageal blood flow.

Authors:  G Duda; J E Huesken; J W Harmon
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  Morphological alterations in experimental esophagitis. Light microscopic and scanning and transmission electron microscopic study.

Authors:  J A Salo; V P Lehto; E Kivilaakso
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 3.199

View more
  8 in total

1.  Signaling in H2O2-induced increase in cell proliferation in Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma cells.

Authors:  Xiaoxu Zhou; Dan Li; Murray B Resnick; Jose Behar; Jack Wands; Weibiao Cao
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  Acid sensitivity of the spinal dorsal root ganglia C-fiber nociceptors innervating the guinea pig esophagus.

Authors:  F Ru; P Banovcin; M Kollarik
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Bile acid reflux contributes to development of esophageal adenocarcinoma via activation of phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase Cgamma2 and NADPH oxidase NOX5-S.

Authors:  Jie Hong; Jose Behar; Jack Wands; Murray Resnick; Li Juan Wang; Ronald A Delellis; David Lambeth; Weibiao Cao
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Lafutidine, a protective H₂ receptor antagonist, enhances mucosal defense in rat esophagus.

Authors:  Yasutada Akiba; Jonathan D Kaunitz
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Role of a novel bile acid receptor TGR5 in the development of oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jie Hong; Jose Behar; Jack Wands; Murray Resnick; Li Juan Wang; Ronald A DeLellis; David Lambeth; Rhonda F Souza; Stuart J Spechler; Weibiao Cao
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Luminal chemosensing and upper gastrointestinal mucosal defenses.

Authors:  Yasutada Akiba; Jonathan D Kaunitz
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  CO2 chemosensing in rat oesophagus.

Authors:  Y Akiba; M Mizumori; M Kuo; M Ham; P H Guth; E Engel; J D Kaunitz
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Ratiometric Organic Fibers for Localized and Reversible Ion Sensing with Micrometer-Scale Spatial Resolution.

Authors:  Loretta L del Mercato; Maria Moffa; Rosaria Rinaldi; Dario Pisignano
Journal:  Small       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 13.281

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.