Literature DB >> 12740231

Gastric tonometry: the hemodynamic monitor of choice (Pro).

Stephen O Heard1.   

Abstract

Controversy exists as to the best means to monitor the critically ill patient and the appropriate end points of therapy. Use of global hemodynamic or metabolic parameters may be normal in the patient who has not been completely or adequately resuscitated. Decreased perfusion to the gut is not well tolerated and may contribute to the development of the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Gastric tonometry is a minimally invasive way to monitor splanchnic perfusion in the critically ill patient. Data suggest that tonometry is useful for outcome prognostication and for detection of early hypovolemia. In addition, use of gastric intramucosal pH or mucosal-arterial CO(2) gap as end points of resuscitation may be superior to other conventional whole-body parameters. For these reasons, gastric tonometry must be considered the hemodynamic monitor of choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12740231     DOI: 10.1378/chest.123.5_suppl.469s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  8 in total

1.  Methods of monitoring shock.

Authors:  Ednan K Bajwa; Atul Malhotra; B Taylor Thompson
Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.119

2.  Mucosal tonometry as early warning of gastrojejunal leak in laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Javier Pascual-Ramírez; Luis G Collar Viñuelas; Jesús Martín; Ginés Bernal; Alfredo Bosque Castro; Nieves García-Serrano
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Reductions in red blood cell 2,3-diphosphoglycerate concentration during continuous renal replacment therapy.

Authors:  Shilpa Sharma; Carlo Brugnara; Rebecca A Betensky; Sushrut S Waikar
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Effects of fluid challenge on gastric mucosal PCO2 in septic patients.

Authors:  Eliézer Silva; Daniel De Backer; Jacques Creteur; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Monitoring in the intensive care.

Authors:  Eric Kipnis; Davinder Ramsingh; Maneesh Bhargava; Erhan Dincer; Maxime Cannesson; Alain Broccard; Benoit Vallet; Karim Bendjelid; Ronan Thibault
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2012-08-27

6.  Bladder mucosal CO2 compared with gastric mucosal CO2 as a marker for low perfusion states in septic shock.

Authors:  Gemma Seller-Pérez; Manuel E Herrera-Gutiérrez; Cesar Aragón-González; Maria M Granados; Juan M Dominguez; Rocío Navarrete; Guillermo Quesada-García; Juán Morgaz; Rafael Gómez-Villamandos
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-19

Review 7.  Gastric tonometry guided therapy in critical care patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; Wei Xuan; Ping Yin; Linlin Wang; Xiaodan Wu; Qingping Wu
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Monitoring Microcirculatory Blood Flow with a New Sublingual Tonometer in a Porcine Model of Hemorrhagic Shock.

Authors:  Péter Palágyi; József Kaszaki; Andrea Rostás; Dániel Érces; Márton Németh; Mihály Boros; Zsolt Molnár
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.