Literature DB >> 12738757

Tacrolimus versus cyclosporin immunosuppression: long-term outcome in renal transplantation.

W Adam Jurewicz1.   

Abstract

Despite reduced risk of acute rejection and increased 1-year graft survival with modern immunosuppressive regimens, chronic allograft nephropathy and death with a functioning graft remain major causes of allograft loss beyond the first year post-transplant. Anti-rejection agents may influence renal transplant outcome not solely through their immunosuppressive activity but also through their effects on other prognostic risk factors. We have analysed 6-year follow-up data from 232 renal transplant recipients randomized to treatment with tacrolimus or cyclosporin microemulsion at the University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff. Tacrolimus-based therapy was associated with a more favourable cardiovascular risk profile than therapy with cyclosporin microemulsion, with an improved lipid profile, lower arterial blood pressure and lower homocysteine levels. Renal function at 1-year post-transplant is probably the most significant factor influencing long-term graft survival. In our analyses, renal function determined by the glomerular filtration rate was significantly better in tacrolimus-treated patients from month 3 post-transplant. Moreover, normal renal function was maintained throughout a 5-year follow-up in a significantly higher proportion of non-rejecting patients treated with tacrolimus than with cyclosporin microemulsion (58 versus 10%, respectively, at 5 years; P=0.002). Morphometric analysis of protocol biopsies revealed that the degree of interstitial fibrosis, similar in both treatment groups at baseline, was significantly greater in the cyclosporin microemulsion group over 12 months. Importantly, patients receiving tacrolimus had significantly greater 6-year graft survival (81 versus 60%, P=0.0496) and a higher projected graft half-life (15 versus 10 years) than those receiving cyclosporin microemulsion. Tacrolimus treatment is associated with a significantly better cardiovascular risk profile and superior renal function compared with cyclosporin microemulsion treatment, which appears to translate into improved long-term graft survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12738757     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfg1028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  18 in total

1.  Impact of irradiation and immunosuppressive agents on immune system homeostasis in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  C Meyer; J Walker; J Dewane; F Engelmann; W Laub; S Pillai; Charles R Thomas; I Messaoudi
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Stability of Extemporaneously Compounded Tacrolimus in Glass Bottles and Plastic Syringes.

Authors:  Mihaela Friciu; Sarra Zaraa; Grégoire Leclair
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2017-02-28

3.  Evaluation of the cost effectiveness of sirolimus versus tacrolimus for immunosuppression following renal transplantation in the UK.

Authors:  Phil McEwan; Simon Dixon; Keshwar Baboolal; Pete Conway; Craig J Currie
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Pharmacogenetics of post-transplant diabetes mellitus in children with renal transplantation treated with tacrolimus.

Authors:  Pauline Lancia; Tiphaine Adam de Beaumais; Valéry Elie; Florentine Garaix; Marc Fila; François Nobili; Bruno Ranchin; Pascale Testevuide; Tim Ulinski; Wei Zhao; Georges Deschênes; Evelyne Jacqz-Aigrain
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 5.  Immunosuppression for long-term maintenance of renal allograft function.

Authors:  Gerd Offermann
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  The cost effectiveness of tacrolimus versus microemulsified cyclosporin: a 10-year model of renal transplantation outcomes.

Authors:  Michelle E Orme; Wieslaw A Jurewicz; Nagappan Kumar; Tracy L McKechnie
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Intra-Coronary Administration of Tacrolimus Improves Myocardial Perfusion and Left Ventricular Function in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (COAT-STEMI) Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Pei-Hsun Sung; Wei-Chun Huang; Ting-Hsing Chao; Cheng-Han Lee; Teng-Yao Yang; Yu-Sheng Lin; Rei-Yeuh Chang; Jun-Ted Chong; Cheng-Hsu Yang; Chieh-Jen Chen; Sheng-Ying Chung; Shu-Kai Hsueh; Chiung-Jen Wu; Hon-Kan Yip
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 2.672

8.  Intra-coronary administration of tacrolimus markedly attenuates infarct size and preserves heart function in porcine myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Sarah Chua; Steve Leu; Jiunn-Jye Sheu; Yu-Chun Lin; Li-Teh Chang; Ying-Hsien Kao; Chia-Hung Yen; Tzu-Hsien Tsai; Yung-Lung Chen; Hsueh-Wen Chang; Cheuk-Kwan Sun; Hon-Kan Yip
Journal:  J Inflamm (Lond)       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  A randomized cross-over comparison of short-term exposure of once-daily extended release tacrolimus and twice-daily tacrolimus on renal function in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Zaltzman; Vesta Lai; Miklos Z Schulz; Kyung-Hee Moon; David Z Cherney
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.782

Review 10.  Chronic Renal Transplant Rejection and Possible Anti-Proliferative Drug Targets.

Authors:  Adnan Bashir Bhatti; Muhammad Usman
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-11-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.