Literature DB >> 12738699

GP and patient predictors of PSA screening in Australian general practice.

Melina Gattellari1, Jane M Young, Jeanette E Ward.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We determined GP and patient variables associated first with men's prior uptake of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening and, subsequently, its initiation during an 'index consultation' in Australian general practice.
METHODS: From the practices of 60 GPs, we recruited a sample of 423 male patients aged 40-70 years. In a waiting room questionnaire completed before their 'index consultation' (retrospective component), men reported their previous PSA screening status. We obtained demographic and clinical data, including the presence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Men also were mailed a questionnaire 2 days after their 'index consultation' to ascertain whether the GP had discussed PSA screening (prospective component) for prostate cancer and other behaviours. GPs themselves completed questionnaires eliciting demographic and practice characteristics as well as their propensity to screen and understanding of the evidence about PSA testing. GP and patient study variables were modelled simultaneously in analyses.
RESULTS: Of those 348 men consulting with their regular GP, 80 (23.0%) reported previously having had a PSA screening test. Men were significantly and independently more likely ever to have had PSA screening if their regular GP reported a propensity to initiate screening [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-4.20; P = 0.009]. GP age also was independently associated with men's PSA screening status [chi-squared (3) P < 0.0001] as was men's age and severity of LUTS (AOR = 2.38, 95% CI 1.58-3.57, P < 0.0001 and AOR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.00-3.19, P = 0.004, respectively). Current smokers were less likely ever to have had a PSA screening test (AOR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.16-0.69; P = 0.003). Discussion of PSA screening in their 'index consultation' was recalled independently more often by older men (AOR = 1.46, 95% CI 1.00-2.13; P = 0.04), those with moderate/severe LUTS (AOR = 1.94, 1.07-3.49; P = 0.04), those whose GP had performed or discussed a cholesterol test (AOR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.03-4.92; P = 0.04) and those whose GP had postgraduate training in family medicine (AOR = 3.13, 95% CI 1.23-8.00; P = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: In the absence as yet of compelling evidence that PSA screening will prolong life or enhance its quality, our findings identify GP and patient factors that could be targeted to modify PSA screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12738699     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmg311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  10 in total

1.  Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening rates and factors associated with screening in Eastern Canadian men: Findings from cross-sectional survey data.

Authors:  Devan Tchir; Marwa Farag; Michael Szafron
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Exploring patient perceptions of PSA screening for prostate cancer: risks, effectiveness, and importance.

Authors:  Scott D Smith; Richard Birtwhistle
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Anal cancer screening behaviors and intentions in men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Gypsyamber D'Souza; Robert L Cook; David Ostrow; Lisette M Johnson-Hill; Dorothy Wiley; Tony Silvestre
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Health risk behaviors and prostate specific antigen awareness among men in California.

Authors:  Firas S Ahmed; Luisa N Borrell; Benjamin A Spencer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  A community study using specified and unspecified scenarios to investigate men's views about PSA screening.

Authors:  Melina Gattellari; Jeanette E Ward
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Who attends a UK diabetes screening programme? Findings from the ADDITION-Cambridge study.

Authors:  L A Sargeant; R K Simmons; R S Barling; R Butler; K M Williams; A T Prevost; A L Kinmonth; N J Wareham; S J Griffin
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.359

7.  PSA testing for prostate cancer: an online survey of the views and reported practice of General Practitioners in the UK.

Authors:  Jo Brett; Eila Watson; Paul Hewitson; Colleen Bukach; Adrian Edwards; Glyn Elwyn; Joan Austoker
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening and follow-up investigations in Māori and non-Māori men in New Zealand.

Authors:  Zuzana Obertová; Nina Scott; Charis Brown; Fraser Hodgson; Alistair Stewart; Michael Holmes; Ross Lawrenson
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Factors prompting PSA-testing of asymptomatic men in a country with no guidelines: a national survey of general practitioners.

Authors:  Frances J Drummond; Anne-Elie Carsin; Linda Sharp; Harry Comber
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Prostate specific antigen testing in family practice: a cross sectional survey of self-reported rates of and reasons for testing participation and risk disclosure.

Authors:  Mariko Carey; Jamie Bryant; Sze Lin Yoong; Grant Russell; Daniel Barker; Rob Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.497

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.