Literature DB >> 12738350

Clinical efficacy of buprenorphine: comparisons to methadone and placebo.

Walter Ling1, Donald R Wesson.   

Abstract

Buprenorphine has been studied extensively since 1978 when it was initially proposed as an alternative to methadone for treatment of opioid dependence. Early work by Jasinski et al., 1978; Mello and Mendelson, 1980; Mello et al., 1982; Mello et al., 1983 and Mendelson et al., 1984 and their colleagues demonstrated buprenorphine's low physical abuse potential and its ability to substitute for heroin and reduce heroin self-administration in opiate-dependent humans. The subsequent early clinical studies suggested that, in clinical settings, buprenorphine was a safe and efficacious opiate dependence pharmacotherapy. Formal approval for general clinical use, however, required that systematic data be gathered on buprenorphine's safety and efficacy in larger groups and a series of controlled clinical trials was designed to evaluate its utility from a medication development perspective. In general, these trials adhered to one of three basic protocol designs: comparison of buprenorphine to methadone; dose comparisons using dose response as an indicator of efficacy; and comparison of buprenorphine to placebo. Retention in treatment, reduction in illicit drug use and craving, and patient and staff ratings of improvements were the most frequently used outcome indicators in these trials. Additional data collected included optimum dosing and dosage schedules, adverse reactions and common side-effects, and other information intended to clarify buprenorphine's benefit-risk relationship and to help prepare guidelines for its safe marketing and utilization by physicians in general clinical practice. This paper presents a review of the buprenorphine/methadone comparison trials conducted in the United States and two such trials conducted in Europe. Also reviewed are three placebo-controlled trials and a buprenorphine/methadone detoxification study. Overall, this series of studies did firmly establish the efficacy of buprenorphine alone and in comparison to methadone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12738350     DOI: 10.1016/s0376-8716(03)00059-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  32 in total

1.  Is methadone too dangerous for opiate addiction? Methadone is still needed in addiction treatments.

Authors:  Andrew Byrne; Richard Hallinan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-01-07

2.  Sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone precipitated withdrawal in subjects maintained on 100mg of daily methadone.

Authors:  James Rosado; Sharon L Walsh; George E Bigelow; Eric C Strain
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Innovation adoption in substance abuse treatment: exposure, trialability, and the Clinical Trials Network.

Authors:  Lori J Ducharme; Hannah K Knudsen; Paul M Roman; J Aaron Johnson
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2007-02-22

4.  Effects of lorcaserin on oxycodone self-administration and subjective responses in participants with opioid use disorder.

Authors:  Laura Brandt; Jermaine D Jones; Suky Martinez; Jeanne M Manubay; Shanthi Mogali; Tatiana Ramey; Frances R Levin; Sandra D Comer
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 5.  The role of human drug self-administration procedures in the development of medications.

Authors:  S D Comer; J B Ashworth; R W Foltin; C E Johanson; J P Zacny; S L Walsh
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Buprenorphine pharmacotherapy and behavioral treatment: comparison of outcomes among prescription opioid users, heroin users and combination users.

Authors:  Suzanne Nielsen; Maureen Hillhouse; Larissa Mooney; Alfonso Ang; Walter Ling
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2014-06-28

7.  A multisite pilot study of extended-release injectable naltrexone treatment for previously opioid-dependent parolees and probationers.

Authors:  Donna M Coviello; James W Cornish; Kevin G Lynch; Tamara Y Boney; Cynthia A Clark; Joshua D Lee; Peter D Friedmann; Edward V Nunes; Timothy W Kinlock; Michael S Gordon; Robert P Schwartz; Elie S Nuwayser; Charles P O'Brien
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.716

8.  Craving predicts opioid use in opioid-dependent patients initiating buprenorphine treatment: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Judith I Tsui; Bradley J Anderson; David R Strong; Michael D Stein
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.829

9.  Bridging waitlist delays with interim buprenorphine treatment: initial feasibility.

Authors:  Stacey C Sigmon; Andrew C Meyer; Bryce Hruska; Taylor Ochalek; Gail Rose; Gary J Badger; John R Brooklyn; Sarah H Heil; Stephen T Higgins; Brent A Moore; Robert P Schwartz
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.913

10.  The effects of maternally administered methadone, buprenorphine and naltrexone on offspring: review of human and animal data.

Authors:  W O Farid; S A Dunlop; R J Tait; G K Hulse
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 7.363

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.